Friday, 1 July, 2022
HomeDiplomacyIndia, China disengagement to conclude in 2-3 days, says Foreign Secretary Shringla

India, China disengagement to conclude in 2-3 days, says Foreign Secretary Shringla

Foreign Secretary says disengagement plan a ‘step in right direction’, adds India and China both feel ‘comfortable’ to discuss such matters in Russia.

Text Size:

New Delhi: The process of disengagement of Indian and Chinese troops at the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in eastern Ladakh is expected to be concluded in the next two to three days, Foreign Secretary Harsh Vardhan Shringla said in Moscow Wednesday.

Addressing the Diplomatic Academy of Russia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Shringla stated that the disengagement plan is a “step in the right direction”. Both New Delhi and Beijing, he added, feel “comfortable” to discuss such matters in Russia. 

“In the last few days we (India and China) have started what is called a disengagement plan. We have come to some kind of understanding with China after nine months of negotiations on a plan of disengagement that would involve frontline troops, that were in close proximity to each other, I would say, going to their permanent bases and thereby preventing any chance of any mishap or miscalculation of troops being in close proximity to each other,” Shringla said.

He added, “We do believe that in the next two or three days this process would have come to a conclusion and I think that’s a step in the right direction.” 

He said it is “difficult to say” how that will go from there, but noted that India and China have had “millennia of historical and civilisational linkages through Buddhism, peaceful trade intercourse of different nature and of course, historically, ties have been there”. 

“How can we take that forward is something that we have to see,” he added.

After a months-long stand-off that began last April, India and China have agreed to disengage at the Pangong Tso lake in Ladakh. The disengagement process began last week.

In his address in Russia, Shringla discussed how the border tensions impacted India-China ties, even as tipped his hat to Delhi’s relationship with Moscow.

Also Read: India and US must know the new Cold War is a different beast – China isn’t USSR

‘No normal relationship without peace’

India and China, Shringla said, share a robust business and economic relationship.

“In the last few years, trade between India and China has gone up significantly. We have $60 billion-$70 billion of trade with China. We have other exchanges, investments in each other’s countries, so on and so forth,” he added. 

“But the developments last year in terms of very large number of troops were amassed on our borders, attempts at multiple transgressions along the LAC did create a situation that I suppose impacted the larger relationship,” he said.

“As we mentioned to our friends in China, that it cannot have a normal bilateral relationship if there is no peace and tranquility in our border areas. So, the relationship is definitely dependent on relations that are normal even on the border,” he added. “We cannot have loss of lives of our troops and situations of transgressions and still go about normal relationship.”

Referring to the fact that Russia also had an unsettled boundary issue with China, which dated back to the 1960s and was resolved in 2004, Shringla said, “I think the fact that we have started a disengagement plan, which is on a small part of our border, which is only eastern Ladakh and only certain sectors, but nonetheless it’s a start and we have to see how that goes from here.” 

‘We are comfortable here (in Russia)’

Shringla also talked about how, while India and China did not have any bilateral track during the period of tensions, they cooperated in plurilateral and multilateral forums such as BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), SCO (Shanghai Cooperation Organisation), and RIC (Russia, India and China).

“There is something to be said for exchanges of that nature that enable our countries to cooperate. Even if we may not find a bilateral track, there is a plurilateral track,” he said.

“It was in Moscow that our foreign ministers met during this crisis, during Covid times it was in Moscow that our defence ministers met.”

He was referring to the fact that, on 5 September 2020, when the tensions at LAC were at their peak, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh met his Chinese counterpart, State Councillor General Wei Fenghe, on the sidelines of an SCO meet.  

This was followed by a meeting between External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and Chinese Foreign Minister and State Councillor Wang Yi, on the sidelines of the SCO foreign ministers’ meeting.  

“Foreign ministers and defence ministers of India and China met in Moscow. So, I think that itself is significant. We are comfortable here (in Russia). We are among friends and when you talk about a special, privileged and strategic partnership, then we obviously have an understanding of the sensitivities and concerns that India has in the Russian foreign policy space…” 

Also Read: Has India spoilt the party for China ahead of CCP’s 100th anniversary? What Xi won’t say

India wants Russia in Indo-Pacific 

Reiterating India’s plan to have Russia come into the Indo-Pacific strategic initiative, Shringla said he discussed this matter during his ongoing visit there.

“Discussed Indo-Pacific with Russia and we certainly like to work more closely with Russia on taking forward the cooperation, along with ASEAN… To us, Indo-Pacific is the seamless interface of Indian Ocean & Pacific Ocean… We see this as a free, open and inclusive region,” he said. 

However, Russia has repeatedly referred to this initiative, along with the Quad grouping, as a result of “anti-China policies”.

Also Read: The LAC disengagement will ultimately lead to China giving up claims in northeast


Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

Why news media is in crisis & How you can fix it

India needs free, fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism even more as it faces multiple crises.

But the news media is in a crisis of its own. There have been brutal layoffs and pay-cuts. The best of journalism is shrinking, yielding to crude prime-time spectacle.

ThePrint has the finest young reporters, columnists and editors working for it. Sustaining journalism of this quality needs smart and thinking people like you to pay for it. Whether you live in India or overseas, you can do it here.

Support Our Journalism


  1. This disengagement is but a short term goal, yet welcome. In its wake India has to persist to achieve the long-term objective to make the Chinese agree to delineation of the LAC on the maps; unless that is, these kind of intrusions and small actions that take place on the LAC will recur.

    It is obvious that “issues” along the LAC is not a thing of a few recent years; it has existed since our Independence and successive Governments have failed to resolve the matter of the undefined LAC with neighboring China. It is natural that intrusions and small actions will take place along this nebulous and undefined border in inhospitable terrain. It is infructuous to discuss these actions in detail in public because of the very nature that it happens along “claimed” and not defined lines.

    What the successive governments since decades have failed to do is take the Nation into confidence about the larger National Security issues like policies and approach being taken to comprehensively resolve the matters of LAC with China.

    Hopefully, we presume, the Government is looking into this.

Comments are closed.

Most Popular