Indian Army war memorial, Shimla | Representational image | Pixabay
Indian Army war memorial, Shimla | Representational image | Pixabay
Text Size:

Shimla: The Army’s decision to shift the headquarters of the Army Training Command (ARTRAC) from Shimla to Meerut in Uttar Pradesh is not going down well in the Himachal capital.

There is a growing disquiet within the ARTRAC — one of Army’s strategic commands — and in Himachal’s political circles as there is a belief here that the process to move the command has begun.

The speculation began last month when Army Chief General Bipin Rawat paid a two-day visit to the ARTRAC headquarters. Sources said he discussed logistics involved in the shifting and later briefed Governor Acharya Devvrat on the decision.

The move will end Shimla’s 27-year association with the ARTRAC after its headquarters was moved here from Mhow in Madhya Pradesh in 1993. It will affect 200-odd officers of all ranks, including two Lt generals, seven major generals, brigadiers and a large number of serving personnel, a majority of whom are locals.

While top ARTRAC officers are tight-lipped on the reasons behind the move, some retired army officers from Himachal have stepped up lobbying against it and have met Chief Minister Jairam Thakur, former chief minister Virbhadra Singh and the leader of Opposition Mukesh Agnihotri.

The retired officers say that as the prime task of ARTRAC, dubbed the Army’s think-tank, is to formulate concepts, training modules and frame new doctrines of warfare and undertake research, Shimla is an ideal place to work as it is quiet and peaceful.

“I don’t see any operational or administrative advantages in moving to Meerut,” says Lt General K. Surendra Nath (retd) who was GoC-In-C ARTRAC between 2011 and 2013. “Before such a decision is actually implemented, the rationale and necessity, besides financial implications, need to be studied and established.”

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

He also rejects the argument of Shimla having a geographical disadvantage or having space constraints.

“In today’s age, developments in technology and communication have cut down all such barriers. For that matter, Meerut doesn’t even have an airport.”

Himachal govt opposed to the move

The Himachal polity, cutting across party lines, is also opposed to the move.

Just four days ago, on 13 June, the Congress’ deputy leader in Rajya Sabha, Anand Sharma, who belongs to Shimla, had shot off a letter to Defence Minister Rajnath Singh questioning the justification for the move.

Quoting huge financial implications for the relocation to Meerut with “no big operational advantages”, Sharma says he will raise the issue in Parliament.

“I will certainly take up this issue in the Parliament,” he told ThePrint. “Wasting hundreds of crores is highly inappropriate. I have also brought out other issues in my letter to Raksha Mantri.”

In February 2019, Leader of Opposition Mukesh Agnihotri raised the issued in the state legislature and called for the shifting to be stopped. To this, Chief Minister Thakur said he would take up the matter with the defence minister.

“The ARTRAC has its own historical and strategic significance. I will leave no stone unturned to withdraw the proposal of shifting HQ ARTRAC,” he had then said. “Our defence forces make their own internal strategies as per their requirement but individually I am against its shifting.”

Chief Secretary B.K. Aggarwal told ThePrint that the chief minister had written to the then Defence Minister Nirmala Sitharaman.

“If need be, we will take up the matter again. Currently, the CM sahib is abroad. Once he returns, he will take it up with the defence minister afresh,” said Aggarwal. “But so far, we have not received any official communication about the proposed shifting.”


Also read: In Shimla’s IAF vs Army fight, nationalism & Balakot battle jobs & highways


The Army’s think-tank

The ARTRAC is one of the seven commands of the Army. The proposal to shift its headquarters to Meerut was cleared in October. The move is part of the Army’s restructuring process, following four comprehensive studies by top generals, which aims to change the way the force functions and fights.

The Army also deems that it needs more space as it is looking to merge the Director General of Military Training (DGMT) at its headquarters with ARTRAC. The two arms complement each other — while the DGMT executes training plans for operations, war games and joint training, the ARTRAC controls the training establishments and comes up with the training programme.

“It’s part of the Army chief’s restructuring process. There is an urgent need to upgrade the skills, maximise the effectiveness of training and formulate new concepts,” said a senior officer posted at ARTRAC, on the condition of anonymity. “Even logistically, there are disadvantages in Shimla as compared to Meerut. Space constraints are also an issue.”

Brigadier Pawan Chaudhary, who belongs to Kangra, and had served in the ARTRAC, sees no reason to object to the move as he feels that ARTRAC will be replaced by some other formation, such as an Infantry Division headquarters or the Punjab and Himachal Pradesh Area headquarters.

“It’s true that the issue is emotive for Shimla. But if ARTRAC moves out, some other formation will come. The Army will certainly use infrastructure and assets it has built over the years,” he says. “It’s true that the Army HQs do find certain locational and logistic issues as a disadvantage for the ARTRAC, particularly involving travel.”


Also read: Both BJP & Congress claim credit for Rohtang Tunnel, but it’s set to miss another deadline


With inputs from Snehesh Alex Philip.

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

8 Comments Share Your Views

8 COMMENTS

  1. What’s the interest of veterans who are opposing this move? I can understand the selfish interest of politicians as they are to guard against their vote bank and they are incapable Of comprehending army’s viewpoint.AHQ has every right to relocate its formations as it suits.Due and proper thought must have been given to it before its approval.Shelving the move to safe guard the selfish interest of few incl politicians will be detrimental to organisation’s interest.Similar thing happened when OTA was proposed to be moved from hot n sultry Madras and look where it got us.Moreover If ARTRAC moves some other formation HQ will replace.So if the FREE LOADERS are worried,they should relax.

  2. Appropose, the ARTRAC is a very significant establishment of the Indian Army in Himachal Pradesh, and so are the sentiments of an attachment of the people’s of Distt. shimla.Though the space for such defence installation is very scarce with the changing scenario of futuristic trg. and war doctrines.The real factors are, Himachal Pradesh is a place of valiant soldiers too,around 4.5-5 lakh serving ,retd.veterans,dependents and civillian are directly or indirectly associated with the ARTRAC Command area and several other institutions housed or accomodated in it, from the point of view several service matters, Veterans issues, employment,CSD facilities,ECHS,MI room ,stn.HQ. DPDO et.etc. Now the questions and fear in the mind of all afforesaid attache are,wheter these all institution housed in and and surrounding command area will remain in the same form or uprooted and shifted at other places and aggravate the problems of all concerned or will remained unharmed?As some instt. are shifting from here which will affect the veterans for sure,ECHS and Stn.HQ,MI,will bore the brunt the most as well as Army RH.Whether demographically such study and survey done prior to shifting the proud ARTRAC,if not must surveillance is needed.Furher comes the important point of strategic Annandale’s trg. ground and so on,whether such places of strategic value will be survived or galloped by some land sharks? The fears are but naturally among the masses AHQ must ensure all Shimlites and veterans,that their interests will not be harmed and the glory of newly arriving army establishments and ARTRAC Shimla will be cherished for long.An assurance by the all concerned authorities will definitely win the hearts of we Shimlites and nationals.Jai Hind

  3. Civilians and political interference versus armed forces should be avoided. Armed forces us best decision makers. What loss simlians will suffer if military establishment shifts m it is necessary to modernise the forces in view of international threat. Simla for artrac was a wrong choice. I support the forces decision to merge or stand by another important unit with it near meerut. Avoid political interference in armed forces decision

  4. There is no need to interfere in the army’s plan to move ARTRAC TO Meerut. The people objecting the plan are playing in the hands of local people engaged in business with ARTRAC. The business interests of locals can not be a riding factor in the efgicient functioning of Army. Similar points were raised in the year 1976 when Gen Raina ordered and got executed the move of a large number of Traing centres. It was a very wise move to relocate the Traing centres.
    .

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here