When poet-activist Bappadittya Sarkar was discussing anti-CAA protests with a friend over the phone, he had no idea his Uber driver would take him to the police.
The last time this matter flared up was when Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, in a very similar directive in April, called for the relocation of stray dogs in the capital.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
All nationalists and patriots love Sudhir Chaudhary.. Its only the ‘chamchas’,traitors, who hate him. He is the BEST JOURNALIST.
U lo*sers have nothing else to do except spreading rumors, lies and hatred..
LOVE U SUDHIR CHAUDHARY…
Well done ‘the print’!
Just shut up u dum*ass and fools…
More than Sudhir, it it you Kairvy who has a bigoted mindset in justifying an indefensible. In justifying Sudhir’s actions, you are implying that Sudhir is a politician rather than a journalist.
When any political group or public group blames then it is understandable that there is clash of thoughts or policies. But when a mainstream TV anchor does it then its wrong. Media has to be neutral otherwise they has to be renamed as particular party’s spokesperson. In that case they are useless to public and a democracy.
Hard to digest this article, you are comparing a journalist to politicians,.. Journalism has a big responsibility to show truth being neutral… I Don’t understand what kind of hatred and favoritism journalist are learning…
#BoycottZeeNews as they humiliated our Citizens of Delhi ncr……who the hell is he to decide to whom delhi people should cast their vote it is their right to elect any one….it is peoples choice nt sudhir chawdhrys buisness to interfere??
Never expected this kind of erroneous PoV from The Print! This anchor (read not journalist) in question has a pattern of coming up with jingoistic perspectives, he’ll be quite apt in writing and acting in Saas Bahu Saga rather than serving public at large.
Never expected this kind of erroneous PoV from The Print! This anchor (read not journalist) in question has a pattern of coming up with jingoistic perspectives, he’ll be quite apt in writing and acting in Saas Bahu Saga rather than serving public at large.
By his comments on zee news often it is seen a political will and being biased and using inappropriate words for people of india. Such kind of journalism should be demoted. He should be sorry for what he said but today again he is using inappropriate words for people of India. Either he doesn’t know what he is saying or he is very well paid.
Yep! This point is obvious to everyone. But how come the author has no understanding of the basic tenets of journalism, and how did The Print’s editors allow this article to be published?
Or is the author implying that mediapersons are not even professionals anymore, and that their reporting/editorial position would carry only as much weight as a layperson’s views?
This article is clearly not logical. Defending a low life of a journalist, like Tihar Chaudhary, when he insults the Delhi people is stupid. Readers aren’t fools to believe this crap.
Whoever has written this article has just missed a very small point. In this need to defend Sudhir Chaudhary who might/might not be directly related to them they have missed out a very obvious point behind everyone’s anger.
The articulate voices of the Left are not broadcasting it on a NEWS SHOW. A JOURNALIST SPEWING HATE FOR THE VOTERS ON A PRIME TIME is the biggest low Indian Journalism could have gone to. Apart from this, the need to defend him with just a line
“But what many forgot was that after the 2019 Lok Sabha election results, many articulate voices on the Left and the liberal side of politics also fell for the same ‘blame the voter’ syndrome.”
Is much lower than Sudhir Choudhary. At least his propaganda is clear. You are just trying to hide behind a line, to produce the whole article and deny the voters the basic right they have; outrage on someone who is blaming a population on national television being a news anchor.
Have some basic shame Sudhir Chaudhary and Have some basic shame Kairvy Grewal
Precisely, Voters have been at blame for making a constitutionally bestowed choice by the losing political groups, but a journalist is expected to be fundamentally neutral. If he or she has a political affiliation, that person is called a spokesperson and not a journalist.
All nationalists and patriots love Sudhir Chaudhary.. Its only the ‘chamchas’,traitors, who hate him. He is the BEST JOURNALIST.
U lo*sers have nothing else to do except spreading rumors, lies and hatred..
LOVE U SUDHIR CHAUDHARY…
Well done ‘the print’!
Just shut up u dum*ass and fools…
How come when dog bewasi barks no one files FIR ? BS secular crap
Nobody was more upset in 2019 win for Modi than shekhar gupta. He sounded so frustrated almost in tears.
More than Sudhir, it it you Kairvy who has a bigoted mindset in justifying an indefensible. In justifying Sudhir’s actions, you are implying that Sudhir is a politician rather than a journalist.
When any political group or public group blames then it is understandable that there is clash of thoughts or policies. But when a mainstream TV anchor does it then its wrong. Media has to be neutral otherwise they has to be renamed as particular party’s spokesperson. In that case they are useless to public and a democracy.
Only one generalized comment: Bhaag *#shjggdk
Where *#shjggdk =Sudheer Chaudhary
Hard to digest this article, you are comparing a journalist to politicians,.. Journalism has a big responsibility to show truth being neutral… I Don’t understand what kind of hatred and favoritism journalist are learning…
Guys please stop referring to Sudhir Chaudhary as a journalist
#BoycottZeeNews as they humiliated our Citizens of Delhi ncr……who the hell is he to decide to whom delhi people should cast their vote it is their right to elect any one….it is peoples choice nt sudhir chawdhrys buisness to interfere??
Never expected this kind of erroneous PoV from The Print! This anchor (read not journalist) in question has a pattern of coming up with jingoistic perspectives, he’ll be quite apt in writing and acting in Saas Bahu Saga rather than serving public at large.
Never expected this kind of erroneous PoV from The Print! This anchor (read not journalist) in question has a pattern of coming up with jingoistic perspectives, he’ll be quite apt in writing and acting in Saas Bahu Saga rather than serving public at large.
By his comments on zee news often it is seen a political will and being biased and using inappropriate words for people of india. Such kind of journalism should be demoted. He should be sorry for what he said but today again he is using inappropriate words for people of India. Either he doesn’t know what he is saying or he is very well paid.
Yep! This point is obvious to everyone. But how come the author has no understanding of the basic tenets of journalism, and how did The Print’s editors allow this article to be published?
Or is the author implying that mediapersons are not even professionals anymore, and that their reporting/editorial position would carry only as much weight as a layperson’s views?
This article is clearly not logical. Defending a low life of a journalist, like Tihar Chaudhary, when he insults the Delhi people is stupid. Readers aren’t fools to believe this crap.
Seriously!!! an article to defend Sudhir Chowdhary….. !! What a shame.
Everyone has a right to criticize , it is the basis for criticism (a mandatory requirement) that decides utility of his criticism.
Whoever has written this article has just missed a very small point. In this need to defend Sudhir Chaudhary who might/might not be directly related to them they have missed out a very obvious point behind everyone’s anger.
The articulate voices of the Left are not broadcasting it on a NEWS SHOW. A JOURNALIST SPEWING HATE FOR THE VOTERS ON A PRIME TIME is the biggest low Indian Journalism could have gone to. Apart from this, the need to defend him with just a line
“But what many forgot was that after the 2019 Lok Sabha election results, many articulate voices on the Left and the liberal side of politics also fell for the same ‘blame the voter’ syndrome.”
Is much lower than Sudhir Choudhary. At least his propaganda is clear. You are just trying to hide behind a line, to produce the whole article and deny the voters the basic right they have; outrage on someone who is blaming a population on national television being a news anchor.
Have some basic shame Sudhir Chaudhary and Have some basic shame Kairvy Grewal
Precisely, Voters have been at blame for making a constitutionally bestowed choice by the losing political groups, but a journalist is expected to be fundamentally neutral. If he or she has a political affiliation, that person is called a spokesperson and not a journalist.
Please get your contexts right.