The government’s supposedly investor-friendly Hydrocarbon Exploration and Licensing Policy in 2016 has failed to yield results. India’s domestic crude oil output has continued to fall.
Women may enter the workforce in large numbers, but evidence from multiple sectors shows that participation does not automatically translate into leadership or economic power.
To Chinese commentators, India has unresolved colonial-era borders, a rigid territorial outlook, pressures from smaller neighbours, and persistent security anxieties.
Politics demands an ability to reach beyond established networks and to appeal to constituencies that do not share the same ideological commitments. Jamaat has struggled on this front.
Production houses and big studios are already fast-tracking projects pitched by pro-Hindutva players. Choking those who choose to remain outside these charmed circles is not a big deal.
Kiran Rao’s ‘Laapataa Ladies’ was the talk of the town in March 2024. In Aditya Dhar’s ‘Dhurandhar: The Revenge’, women serve as mere victims and plot devices.
Issued amid a West Asia war-induced energy crunch, the order now legally binds all entities controlling land, roads and housing societies to facilitate laying of pipelines.
The countries signed a memorandum for co-development of UNICORN masts in November 2024. India has been second Asian nation to have such an agreement with Tokyo, after Philippines.
The Opinion piece bring about some good points, including why highlight the crass comments and publicize it further.
But one thing I don’t at all agree with is the last section, where the author is questioning the call for regulation. I was surprised by that because I felt there is no logical argument/ comparison there.
Af fas as I know, The TV and Print media are owned by a group of people, who along with the editor take care of the self-regulation part of it. Editors, especially have experience in the field.
Can we expect the same from the editor of Ranveer or Samay’s shows? Do they even have an editor who looks into these things? If so, shouldn’t they have edited the creepy comments from Ranveer in the first place?
I believe they only look at what kind of content gives them the maximum views and clicks.
Or do we expect youtube to self-regulate? The amount of content that’s dumped on YouTube makes it almost impossible. Unless there is a law, there is no incentive for YouTube to even try!
How come this was not considered when the author wrote that last paragraph??? Please help me understand if I am missing something
enough over analysis of this crappy pervert //Hang all of them along with this writer .
The Opinion piece bring about some good points, including why highlight the crass comments and publicize it further.
But one thing I don’t at all agree with is the last section, where the author is questioning the call for regulation. I was surprised by that because I felt there is no logical argument/ comparison there.
Af fas as I know, The TV and Print media are owned by a group of people, who along with the editor take care of the self-regulation part of it. Editors, especially have experience in the field.
Can we expect the same from the editor of Ranveer or Samay’s shows? Do they even have an editor who looks into these things? If so, shouldn’t they have edited the creepy comments from Ranveer in the first place?
I believe they only look at what kind of content gives them the maximum views and clicks.
Or do we expect youtube to self-regulate? The amount of content that’s dumped on YouTube makes it almost impossible. Unless there is a law, there is no incentive for YouTube to even try!
How come this was not considered when the author wrote that last paragraph??? Please help me understand if I am missing something