Lawyer M.L. Sharma, known for poorly-drafted petitions, is seeking prosecution against senior Supreme Court lawyers for their attempt to 'destabilise' judiciary.
SC lawyer Prashant Bhushan claimed Utsav Bains met Ranjan Gogoi twice before filing affidavit in SC in which he claimed larger conspiracy to frame CJI.
Delhi Police Crime Branch claims to have arrived at the conclusion following the interrogation of the two former Supreme Court staff arrested in the case.
India has been pleading for long to bring reforms in institutions like the United Nations, IMF, and World Bank, which it believes are West-dominated and don’t reflect current global realities.
Mini deal will likely see no cut in 10% baseline tariff on Indian exports announced by Trump on 2 April, it is learnt, but additional 26% tariffs are set to be reduced.
Capable of being fired in plain and high-altitude areas, it has day-and-night capability and two-way data link to support post-launch target, aim-point update.
Public, loud, upfront, filled with impropriety and high praise sometimes laced with insults. This is what we call Trumplomacy. But the larger objective is the same: American supremacy.
Many People think that any person form the North East states holding top post can be harassed and defame by alleging any fake issues. But law of the land is same for all. without doubt I can say that if she could not face inquiry she is just attempt to tarnish the image of Gogoi and the entire North East People. She must face the trial. Why should she withdraw now.
This woman cannot answer the judges’ questions because her complaint itself is shaky – – this she is twisting into saying that she is feeling intimidated. Now her lawyer will appear for her and show his/her creativity in fielding questions. A farce is going to play out hence onwards in this case.
If the complainant is feeling intimidated by being in the PRESENCE of big judges, then this can be tried : let her sit comfortably in a separate room, ALONE, and let the questions be put to her through a speaker, in a sweet voice, not of any of the judges’, and let her reply through a microphone. I bet she won’t be able to reply and still want her lawyer to answer on her behalf.
First there is no complaint as per due process but writing to all judges of SC. Then tale of Kafkaesque conspiracy, then why there is only one lady on the panel, then why is a judge who used to frequently visit CJI’s residence on the panel, then now that there are 2 women judges on a panel of 3, complain about getting intimidated. When you have worked as assistant to CJI, how can you get intimidated by other judges ? Surely all these provide reasonable grounds to doubt her motive. How is this justice for CJI – can anyone make a character destroying charge and get away? Even then court must do everything to get a closure in which there is either guilt or innocence of CJI is proven beyond reasonable doubt. There is a lesson for SC in this – when you do things like holding a press conference about internal matters of SC, you lose the gravitas of an institution like SC. After that anybody thinks they can getaway by saying anything.
Free and fair atmosphere should be given to the complainant with her council. It is very difficult for her to deal with three member committee without the council.
If SC CJI cannot file FIR against her for misconduct blackmail and corruption she will go on with such dramatics to compel him to resign as per the plan conspiracy hatched by a gang of Lawyers and Congressman.Kapil sibal Prashant bhushan and Rahul Gandhi re involved in the deep rotted conspiracy.The media like QUINT PRINT WIRE SCROLL CARAVAN are all involved in making mockery of SC.
TIME for SC to withdraw the Lawyers License to all who conspired against CJI.
Time to file FIR against the Woman for misconduct blackmail and corruption.
Imposition of huge penalty on all vexatious petition file by ML Sharma and P Bhushan
ELSE CJI GOGOI should Resign forthwith taking moral responsibility
Very unfortunate. One cannot think of a more judicious forum than three judges – including two women – of the apex court. They deal with issues of far greater import each working day. It does not matter whether they are acting judicially or administratively, since acting with integrity and impartiality is common to both situations. Ms Vrinda Grover is a respected figure. If her presence gives the complainant a sense of not being overawed, perhaps that could be allowed. In any case, this issue merits swift, credible closure.
Many People think that any person form the North East states holding top post can be harassed and defame by alleging any fake issues. But law of the land is same for all. without doubt I can say that if she could not face inquiry she is just attempt to tarnish the image of Gogoi and the entire North East People. She must face the trial. Why should she withdraw now.
Why lawyer is required, cannot she speak what she knows. Appears to be fake complaint.
This woman cannot answer the judges’ questions because her complaint itself is shaky – – this she is twisting into saying that she is feeling intimidated. Now her lawyer will appear for her and show his/her creativity in fielding questions. A farce is going to play out hence onwards in this case.
If the complainant is feeling intimidated by being in the PRESENCE of big judges, then this can be tried : let her sit comfortably in a separate room, ALONE, and let the questions be put to her through a speaker, in a sweet voice, not of any of the judges’, and let her reply through a microphone. I bet she won’t be able to reply and still want her lawyer to answer on her behalf.
First there is no complaint as per due process but writing to all judges of SC. Then tale of Kafkaesque conspiracy, then why there is only one lady on the panel, then why is a judge who used to frequently visit CJI’s residence on the panel, then now that there are 2 women judges on a panel of 3, complain about getting intimidated. When you have worked as assistant to CJI, how can you get intimidated by other judges ? Surely all these provide reasonable grounds to doubt her motive. How is this justice for CJI – can anyone make a character destroying charge and get away? Even then court must do everything to get a closure in which there is either guilt or innocence of CJI is proven beyond reasonable doubt. There is a lesson for SC in this – when you do things like holding a press conference about internal matters of SC, you lose the gravitas of an institution like SC. After that anybody thinks they can getaway by saying anything.
Free and fair atmosphere should be given to the complainant with her council. It is very difficult for her to deal with three member committee without the council.
If SC CJI cannot file FIR against her for misconduct blackmail and corruption she will go on with such dramatics to compel him to resign as per the plan conspiracy hatched by a gang of Lawyers and Congressman.Kapil sibal Prashant bhushan and Rahul Gandhi re involved in the deep rotted conspiracy.The media like QUINT PRINT WIRE SCROLL CARAVAN are all involved in making mockery of SC.
TIME for SC to withdraw the Lawyers License to all who conspired against CJI.
Time to file FIR against the Woman for misconduct blackmail and corruption.
Imposition of huge penalty on all vexatious petition file by ML Sharma and P Bhushan
ELSE CJI GOGOI should Resign forthwith taking moral responsibility
Very unfortunate. One cannot think of a more judicious forum than three judges – including two women – of the apex court. They deal with issues of far greater import each working day. It does not matter whether they are acting judicially or administratively, since acting with integrity and impartiality is common to both situations. Ms Vrinda Grover is a respected figure. If her presence gives the complainant a sense of not being overawed, perhaps that could be allowed. In any case, this issue merits swift, credible closure.