Justice Nazeer disagreed with majority judgment which refused to refer to larger bench the question of whether mosque is integral to practice of Islam.
New...
Thursday’s SC ruling paves way for final hearing in Ayodhya land dispute case to begin. And a verdict may even be possible before the 2019 Lok Sabha polls.
For an industry globally classified as hazardous, protections such as health insurance and a provident fund for workers are necessities. In Sivakasi, they remain elusive.
The industry forecasts exports are set to grow 16% in 2025-26, boosted by surplus domestic production and a drive to push into 26 underserved global markets with strong potential.
Indigenisation level will progressively increase up to 60 percent with key sub-assemblies, electronics and mechanical parts being manufactured locally.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
My Comments about Judgement on 497: I think there is no Significance of 7 pheras in wedding now where the couple makes 7 promises to one another in the presence of God (Fire) and thereby pledge themselves to each other. Hindu marriage act should not ignore that as well while considering human rights and woman protection. It looks the only person responsible to maintain the marriage is man and woman is free from all angle and can do whatever she wants. I am not sure how it will strengthen the Hindu marriage as per Hon. Supreme Court if having sex with other partner after marriage is just fine. we have to agree that the 497 was not at all useful because it was difficult to prove in courts but the message from judgement is clear that the only law made for husbands to seek justice is scrapped and now the laws in Hindu Marriage act is only for one gender(woman).
“tava bhakti as vadedvachacha” Means the wife pledges her loyalty to her husband and promises to not look at other men. If this is against human rights then all marriages as per Hindu customs shall be called Illegal.
My Comments about Judgement on 497: I think there is no Significance of 7 pheras in wedding now where the couple makes 7 promises to one another in the presence of God (Fire) and thereby pledge themselves to each other. Hindu marriage act should not ignore that as well while considering human rights and woman protection. It looks the only person responsible to maintain the marriage is man and woman is free from all angle and can do whatever she wants. I am not sure how it will strengthen the Hindu marriage as per Hon. Supreme Court if having sex with other partner after marriage is just fine. we have to agree that the 497 was not at all useful because it was difficult to prove in courts but the message from judgement is clear that the only law made for husbands to seek justice is scrapped and now the laws in Hindu Marriage act is only for one gender(woman).
“tava bhakti as vadedvachacha” Means the wife pledges her loyalty to her husband and promises to not look at other men. If this is against human rights then all marriages as per Hindu customs shall be called Illegal.