It is not yet clear as to which of advocate Prashant Bhushan's tweets have been construed as contemptuous by the top court. The matter is scheduled to be heard on Wednesday.
The state withdrew general consent a day after the BJP sought a CBI probe into the audio tapes which purportedly recorded conversations of horse trading.
Kapoor, currently in judicial custody, was arrested in March by the ED in connection with an alleged multi-crore case, also involving scam-hit Dewan Housing Finance Limited.
During the hearing, the bench observed that 15 or 20 years is not a reasonable time period and the companies should come forward with appropriate time frame.
Advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi made the submission in court, which was hearing a plea filed by ‘rebel’ Congress leader Sachin Pilot & 18 others, challenging their disqualification.
After Central Vista redevelopment, new Lok Sabha chamber will accommodate 876 members, and 1,224 during a joint session, CPWD says in affidavit submitted to SC.
Since the Covid-19 lockdown was announced on 25 March, courts have only been taking up ‘urgent’ matters, with no certainty so far on when normal hearings can resume.
New bill aims to fix key issues with IBC 2016, including delays & patchy implementation, and protect creditors, with window for genuine promoters to retain control of their companies.
Billed as the military’s own version of Raisina Dialogue, the event will spotlight on tech-driven warfighting, lessons from Operation Sindoor and release of three new doctrines.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
How are you seeking support from general public, when several media are indulge in fake news and deliberately deviating public attention by making false news and news without checking fact.
Supreme court is not the personal fiefdom of Prashant Bhushan and his ilk. Bhushan has not only been criticising the judgements which have gone against him but he has personally attacked judges of the SC including at least 3 CJIs including the current one Mr Bobade, Mr Gogoi and Mr Dipak Mishra. And this action against Bhushan should have been taken long back. It has come rather late in the day. Anyway now that the SC has taken suo moto cognizance of his stupid utterances the court should ensure that maximum jail sentence as prescribed in the law should me meted out to him. He deserves no mercy at all.
How are you seeking support from general public, when several media are indulge in fake news and deliberately deviating public attention by making false news and news without checking fact.
Supreme court is not the personal fiefdom of Prashant Bhushan and his ilk. Bhushan has not only been criticising the judgements which have gone against him but he has personally attacked judges of the SC including at least 3 CJIs including the current one Mr Bobade, Mr Gogoi and Mr Dipak Mishra. And this action against Bhushan should have been taken long back. It has come rather late in the day. Anyway now that the SC has taken suo moto cognizance of his stupid utterances the court should ensure that maximum jail sentence as prescribed in the law should me meted out to him. He deserves no mercy at all.
The Supreme Court like the Narendra Modi government has become sensitive and is unable to handle plain truths.