In my earlier comment I forgot to mention one of the most important issues that crossed my mind right at the outset, when I began reading this report. nd that is what is the criteria adopted to decide pendency? Has the judiciary clubbed all cases registered and pending decisions on a particular day? Or had it excluded cases registered within a particular period, say within 3 months from the prescribed date?
They can blame the police and the prosecution for judgments getting delayed and even going awry finally. They want people to believe that judges are pure as angels, efficient as Lord Yama, the Dharma Raja, and honest as Harichandra.
The people know better and their assessment is reflected in the phrase tariq pe tariq being bandied about our courts. Then there are the issues of corruption and nepotism.
Transparency International had once reported that the police and judiciary in India are the most corrupt. And I understand that those who reported it are being prosecuted under the contempt of court act. Such atrocities are only possible with our judiciary.
And honestly, I believe, the judiciary would be one of the factors affecting the stress levels of investigating officers. And where do they get their frustration out? On hapless citizens, of course.
Biased article. Real culprits are judges. Quality of judges is a real problem. Quantity of judges is not a problem. Form judicial ombudsman and make 1000 members of ordinary people. Give power to ombudsmen to hang judges when they do wrong things. In one year indian judicial system will be best in world after first 5 judges are hanged to death.
There is nothing wrong is pointing out that the police is under staffed and over worked. However, the truth is that even if there were more police, very little would change as far as punishment is concerned. The real culprit is the legal system and the judiciary is a key component of that. Most of the high profile cases are solved within days and yet it takes decades to convict anybody. Just recently, the terrorists who killed 80 innocent people in Jaipur were convicted after 11 years. Of course, punishment is far away because the high courts and the supreme courts are certain to take another 10 years. If you bothered to look at the details of the case, you would find that such cases keep getting adjourned and sometimes blocked for years by higher court rulings. Blaming the police is a tried and true tactic by all sides since independence; the reality remains that the legal system is the biggest culprit.
ALLOW POLICE TO TACKLE THEIR WAYS REMOVE LAW ASKING HEAD TO USE BULLET WE COPY EVERYTHING FROM ADVANCED COUNTRIES BUT WHEN IT COMES DEFENDING LOSER OPPOSITION MAKE RIOTS ONCE FOR KILL THEM
In my earlier comment I forgot to mention one of the most important issues that crossed my mind right at the outset, when I began reading this report. nd that is what is the criteria adopted to decide pendency? Has the judiciary clubbed all cases registered and pending decisions on a particular day? Or had it excluded cases registered within a particular period, say within 3 months from the prescribed date?
Judiciary is the biggest threat to rule of law.
They can blame the police and the prosecution for judgments getting delayed and even going awry finally. They want people to believe that judges are pure as angels, efficient as Lord Yama, the Dharma Raja, and honest as Harichandra.
The people know better and their assessment is reflected in the phrase tariq pe tariq being bandied about our courts. Then there are the issues of corruption and nepotism.
Transparency International had once reported that the police and judiciary in India are the most corrupt. And I understand that those who reported it are being prosecuted under the contempt of court act. Such atrocities are only possible with our judiciary.
And honestly, I believe, the judiciary would be one of the factors affecting the stress levels of investigating officers. And where do they get their frustration out? On hapless citizens, of course.
Biased article. Real culprits are judges. Quality of judges is a real problem. Quantity of judges is not a problem. Form judicial ombudsman and make 1000 members of ordinary people. Give power to ombudsmen to hang judges when they do wrong things. In one year indian judicial system will be best in world after first 5 judges are hanged to death.
There is nothing wrong is pointing out that the police is under staffed and over worked. However, the truth is that even if there were more police, very little would change as far as punishment is concerned. The real culprit is the legal system and the judiciary is a key component of that. Most of the high profile cases are solved within days and yet it takes decades to convict anybody. Just recently, the terrorists who killed 80 innocent people in Jaipur were convicted after 11 years. Of course, punishment is far away because the high courts and the supreme courts are certain to take another 10 years. If you bothered to look at the details of the case, you would find that such cases keep getting adjourned and sometimes blocked for years by higher court rulings. Blaming the police is a tried and true tactic by all sides since independence; the reality remains that the legal system is the biggest culprit.
ALLOW POLICE TO TACKLE THEIR WAYS REMOVE LAW ASKING HEAD TO USE BULLET WE COPY EVERYTHING FROM ADVANCED COUNTRIES BUT WHEN IT COMES DEFENDING LOSER OPPOSITION MAKE RIOTS ONCE FOR KILL THEM