Mam, Al Takia to next level.. u don’t know Aurangzeb books and Alamgiri is the integral part of Madarsaa curriculum and average Muslim feels that they ruled this country and need to do it again.. if you are really honest which I am sure you are not.. look at the photo of how many people attended Kalam funeral versus Menon..
Articulated well but their is an inherent bias for the Muslim community in the writing.
Physical violence can never be equated to other forms of dissent and outrage which Muslim community indulged in the first place.
Under article 19(1) every one has a right for freedom of expression as long as it doesn’t vitiate the public tensions. In todays context and atmosphere the article is stretched a bit though.
So the cat in the room is missing and silently white washed in the guise of some moral high ground which is not easy when social polarisation is the quick incentive that gives a high for the vast majority at the lower levels of society for economic depravity is an ongoing pain that needs a occasional painkiller like this.
Who is responsible for this behaviour again the community leaders at lower level who can sway a large audience in a mins notice.
We know where does it happen and how does it happen. The Nagpur Riots was so meticulously planned that one communities vehicles, shops and houses were not damaged.
So Print even if it publishes opinion piece should stop giving one sided moral lessons without digging deep into the practical nuance of the problem, instead of focusing on the English literature of the case.
Very good article! The conclusion is really good, “If peace and coexistence are ever to be more than empty aspirations, the focus must shift from divisive historical figures to those who built bridges. Societies do not move forward by constantly reviving past battles—they progress by choosing what to remember, how to remember it, and what lessons to carry into the future.” I have a question for her. Building bridges among various groups happens automatically when people focus on overall social development, on positive politics. Which party comes to her mind? The answer is Aam Aadmi Party.
Mam, Al Takia to next level.. u don’t know Aurangzeb books and Alamgiri is the integral part of Madarsaa curriculum and average Muslim feels that they ruled this country and need to do it again.. if you are really honest which I am sure you are not.. look at the photo of how many people attended Kalam funeral versus Menon..
Does that even need to be said.
Aurangzeb, Jinnah and Godse would be proud after the riots. Some hindutvadis and islamists dont see that irony.
The real target is those who consider Aurangzeb their guiding light. Those who think Aurangzeb is the ideal Muslim are the ones being targeted.
Articulated well but their is an inherent bias for the Muslim community in the writing.
Physical violence can never be equated to other forms of dissent and outrage which Muslim community indulged in the first place.
Under article 19(1) every one has a right for freedom of expression as long as it doesn’t vitiate the public tensions. In todays context and atmosphere the article is stretched a bit though.
So the cat in the room is missing and silently white washed in the guise of some moral high ground which is not easy when social polarisation is the quick incentive that gives a high for the vast majority at the lower levels of society for economic depravity is an ongoing pain that needs a occasional painkiller like this.
Who is responsible for this behaviour again the community leaders at lower level who can sway a large audience in a mins notice.
We know where does it happen and how does it happen. The Nagpur Riots was so meticulously planned that one communities vehicles, shops and houses were not damaged.
So Print even if it publishes opinion piece should stop giving one sided moral lessons without digging deep into the practical nuance of the problem, instead of focusing on the English literature of the case.
Very good article! The conclusion is really good, “If peace and coexistence are ever to be more than empty aspirations, the focus must shift from divisive historical figures to those who built bridges. Societies do not move forward by constantly reviving past battles—they progress by choosing what to remember, how to remember it, and what lessons to carry into the future.” I have a question for her. Building bridges among various groups happens automatically when people focus on overall social development, on positive politics. Which party comes to her mind? The answer is Aam Aadmi Party.