Delhi government’s decision to lower the drinking age to 21 from 25 and stop operating government liquor stores is pragmatic. The age bar of 25 didn’t make sense when people can vote and marry earlier. And selling alcohol isn’t the government’s job. Privatising the entire business will bring more revenue.
Tussle between Mizoram and Delhi over Myanmarese refugee crisis imprudent, must work together
The tussle between Mizoram and Delhi over Myanmarese refugees is imprudent. They must work together sensitively and handle the crisis respecting traditional ties and tribal kinship. But a large influx can upset the delicate demographic balance. Limit shelter to police and soldiers who fear reprisals for not following inhuman orders.
Whatever be the truth of the recent allegations, why should an establishment that serves duty paid liquor anywhere in the country be subject to predatory visits from police or excise officials. This should form a component of the Ease of Doing Business Index. The one aspect on which the police should be unforgiving is to curb driving under the influence of liquor.
One understands the central government’s very muted response to the military coup. Followed the brutal repression by the soldiers, who have already shot dead 250 idealistic young freedom fighters. Even so, sending fleeing Burmese back to almost certain death or incarceration would violate the globally respected principle of Refoulement. Soldiers / policemen who are showing both principle and courage should certainly be protected. How civilians should be treated is for the government to determine. Other Quad members will be observant.