Thank you dear subscribers, we are overwhelmed with your response.
Your Turn is a unique section from ThePrint featuring points of view from its subscribers. If you are a subscriber, have a point of view, please send it to us. If not, do subscribe here: https://theprint.in/subscribe/
While securing freedom was a monumental achievement, the challenges that followed were equally, if not more, daunting. While the freedom struggle has been extensively documented, the immense task of nation-building has received comparatively less attention. Unifying a fragmented land, healing the deep scars of Partition, and drafting a comprehensive constitution for a diverse nation demanded extraordinary vision, determination, and relentless effort. Today, more than seven decades later, India’s continued unity and thriving democracy stand as a testament to the success of that monumental endeavour.
The newly independent nation faced profound divisions of language, religion, region, and culture, making the task of forging a unified identity incredibly challenging. The first and most fundamental challenge was defining what India truly was—a question that, while seemingly straightforward today, was far from clear at the time. This complexity becomes evident when comparing Nepal, Bhutan, Mysore, and Hyderabad. All four were semi-sovereign regions governed by monarchies, each enjoying a degree of internal autonomy under the British Empire. However, the key difference lay in their relationship with the British: Nepal and Bhutan retained their sovereignty through treaties, maintaining independence in their internal and external affairs, while Mysore and Hyderabad had accepted British paramountcy, allowing British control over their external relations. As a result, following independence, Nepal and Bhutan emerged as independent nations, whereas Mysore and Hyderabad were integrated into the Indian Union.
The 1889 Interpretation Act distinguished British-controlled provinces from semi-autonomous princely states. The Government of India Act of 1935 sought to unite them under a single federation, but the princely states, fearing a loss of autonomy, refused to join. When the British left in 1947, these states technically regained sovereignty, complicating India’s integration. The Instrument of Accession (IoA), originally meant for the federation, was repurposed to unify the princely states into independent India. In just over two months, India successfully integrated all but three states through diplomacy, persuasion, and, when necessary, military action—a remarkable achievement.
Yet, this was only the beginning of the nation’s challenges. Three dissenting princely states still needed to be integrated. The human tragedy following the Partition had to be addressed, with millions displaced and in need of support. A war with Pakistan was imminent, further complicating matters. Additionally, the princely states required administrative integration, including the transition from monarchy to democracy. Finally, the monumental task of drafting a constitution for the new nation loomed large. Any major misstep during this critical period could have led to the fragmentation of the fledgling nation.
Among the three dissenting princely states, Hyderabad and Junagarh were integrated through brief military interventions, while Kashmir remains an unresolved issue. In hindsight, one can debate how these situations might have been managed differently. Nevertheless, aside from this enduring challenge, the other integration efforts were handled with notable efficiency and foresight.
Drafting the Indian Constitution was as challenging as achieving independence. The newly free nation had to unite a diverse population divided by language, religion, caste, and culture. The Constitution aimed to promote unity, protect minority rights, ensure harmony, and balance state autonomy with central authority. It also sought to establish social justice by abolishing untouchability and introducing affirmative action for marginalized communities. Additionally, it had to include transitional provisions to integrate princely states and incorporated mechanisms for the Constitution to evolve with the nation’s changing aspirations.
Two key documents shaped the drafting of the Indian Constitution: the Nehru Report of 1928 and the Government of India Act of 1935. The Nehru Report, prepared by an all-party committee led by Motilal Nehru, was India’s first indigenous attempt at drafting a constitution. It emphasized fundamental rights, universal suffrage, and equality, laying the ideological foundation and providing the soul of the future Constitution. In contrast, the Government of India Act of 1935, enacted by the British Parliament, provided the structural framework and served as the de facto governing system until India became a republic on January 26, 1950. It introduced key features like federalism, a bicameral legislature, and a division of powers between the central government and provinces—elements that later influenced the formation of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha in independent India.
The Constituent Assembly, formed in 1946 to draft the constitution, initially had 389 members representing British Indian provinces and princely states, elected indirectly through proportional representation to ensure diverse community representation. After Partition in 1947, the membership reduced to 299 as representatives from Pakistan withdrew. Recognizing the complexity of uniting such a diverse nation, the Assembly established specialized committees to address key aspects of governance, rights, and administration. These efforts laid the groundwork for a comprehensive constitution that reflected India’s rich cultural, social, and political diversity, drawing inspiration from global models while being uniquely tailored to India’s needs.
By February 1948, the first draft of the Constitution was completed, reflecting the nation’s aspirations for equality, justice, and liberty. This was followed by thorough debates across three readings from November 1948 to October 1949, during which over 2,000 amendments were proposed, highlighting the Assembly’s commitment to inclusivity. All deliberations were meticulously recorded and are now preserved in archives for future generations. The process culminated in the Constitution’s adoption on November 26, 1949, and its enforcement on January 26, 1950, marking India’s transformation into a sovereign democratic republic and the beginning of a new era of inclusivity, equity, and justice.
In the broader global context, India’s Constitution holds a significant place in history. It is most likely the seventh oldest constitution in the world drafted by a representative constituent assembly that remains in force today. The nations which have older constitutions include the United States (1787), Norway (1814), Belgium (1831), Mexico (1917), Iceland (1944), and Italy (1948). This distinction underscores India’s remarkable constitutional continuity and highlights its pioneering role in shaping democratic governance in the post-colonial world. Rather than fragmenting into isolated states, the nation emerged as a cohesive, united entity, demonstrating resilience and determination in the face of unprecedented challenges.
These pieces are being published as they have been received – they have not been edited/fact-checked by ThePrint.