scorecardresearch
Sunday, November 3, 2024
Support Our Journalism
HomeWorldUK House of Lords panel recommends India critic Nazir Ahmed be expelled...

UK House of Lords panel recommends India critic Nazir Ahmed be expelled for sexual assault

Lord Nazir Ahmed, the first Muslim appointed to the House of Lords as a life peer, retired from the House on 14 November.

Follow Us :
Text Size:

New Delhi: The United Kingdom’s House of Lords Conduct Committee published a report Tuesday on the conduct of former member Lord Nazir Ahmed, recommending that he be expelled from the House, and that his appeals against findings of the Commissioner for Standards be dismissed. The report will be presented to the House of Lords Thursday, 19 November.

Lord Nazir Ahmed retired from the House of Lords on 14 November, but the committee had decided before that to recommend his expulsion.

In 2019, Lord Nazir Ahmed was accused of exploiting his position to “pursue sex with vulnerable women who asked him for help”. It has been reported that in 2017, Tahira Zaman (43) approached Ahmed, hoping he would help her in getting the police to investigate a Muslim healer who she thought was a danger to women. Zaman told BBC that he repeatedly asked her to dinner and she finally agreed. Weeks after when she contacted him about the case, he asked her to come to his east London home.

The two had a consensual sexual relationship. However Zaman said: “I was looking for help and he took advantage of me. He abused his power.”

In another case, a woman who did not want to be identified told BBC Newsnight that when she had reached out to Lord Ahmed for help, he allegedly suggested that she should spend the night at his London home. She thought of this as a proposition for sex, which she refused.

Lord Ahmed has denied any wrongdoing. In a statement in 2019, he said: “I completely deny the allegation that I have exploited my position to pursue an inappropriate relationship with any member of the public (vulnerable or otherwise) or that I have acted inappropriately in the presence of women either in my personal or professional capacity.”


Also read: UK’s Lord Kilclooney sparks outrage for calling US VP-elect Kamala Harris ‘the Indian’


Who is Nazir Ahmed

Ahmed, who was born in Pakistan-occupied Kashmir, migrated to the United Kingdom as a child and became the first Muslim member of the House of Lords for life.

He has been a critic of the Indian government’s policies, especially on Jammu and Kashmir. When Article 370 was scrapped, Ahmed said India was an “occupation force” in J&K, which wanted to pursue “demographic changes to settle BJP/RSS extremists”.

In 2018, he also organised a protest outside the Indian High Commission in London, to say that minorities in India were not safe. He is also reportedly a supporter of Khalistani groups.

He was severely castigated by both Congress and BJP leaders for his tweet against Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Lord Ahmed tweeted a Times of India article quoting BJP MP ‘Sadhvi’ Pragya Singh Thakur claiming that the opposition was resorting to sorcery on party leaders, many of whom had died in the last few years.

“Claims of sorcery, Jadoo , magic, witchcraft, on @BJP4India by opposition Jaitley, Gaur former CM of Madhya Pradesh, Shushma Swaraj , Atal Vajpayee , Manohar Parrikar CM Goa and Arun Jaitley … have all died in the last one year hey @narendramodi is next (sic),” Ahmed wrote on 26 August 2019.

The same year, he was charged with serious allegations of sexual assault on a boy under the age of 11 from 1971 to 1974.

Findings of the committee

The House of Lords Conduct Committee reached its conclusion on the basis of the incident between Ahmed and Zaman.

After an appeal by Ahmed, the House of Lords Conduct Committee upheld the findings of the House of Lords Commissioner for Standards. In her findings, the Commissioner noted that by sexually assaulting Zaman in 2017, Ahmed had breached the House of Lords Code by failing to act on his “personal honour”, and that by lying about his intentions and failing to further Zaman’s case, he had acted “without honesty or integrity”. Therefore, he was in breach of the Code.

The Commissioner further noted: “I find that Lord Ahmed exploited Ms Zaman emotionally and sexually even though he knew she was receiving treatment for anxiety and depression.”

The Commissioner also said Ahmed deliberately gave “inaccurate and misleading accounts to conceal his behaviour towards Ms Zaman”, and failed to “genuinely” co-operate with the investigation.

Based on this, the Conduct Committee dismissed Lord Ahmed’s appeal against the Commissioner’s, findings and also recommended that he be “expelled from the House”.


Also read: UK Labour Party suspends controversial former leader Jeremy Corbyn after anti-Semitism probe


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube, Telegram & WhatsApp

Support Our Journalism

India needs fair, non-hyphenated and questioning journalism, packed with on-ground reporting. ThePrint – with exceptional reporters, columnists and editors – is doing just that.

Sustaining this needs support from wonderful readers like you.

Whether you live in India or overseas, you can take a paid subscription by clicking here.

Support Our Journalism

14 COMMENTS

  1. Dear Moderators,
    Will you please take steps to ban the commenters who abuse a religion and its messenger? You can find few such instances on this forum. This should never be acceptable.
    Many thanks in anticipation.

  2. Is there any surprise? It is just Asian model exported to US.

    In India people know that political parties recruits thugs, criminals from minority community. The reason is these thugs, Criminals, and Gangsters through their intimidation manage to keep securing votes for their parties. This in turn is used by them to get protection from enforcement agencies. Connected media is used by political parties to whitewash them. That is the reason Indian Muslims neighborhoods are dominated by extremely reactionary and thuggish elements.
    Progressive and moderate Muslims know that challenging these people is dangerous not only to them personally but also to their families, therefore they keep low profile or quiet. The worst part is political parties they are associated with are not backing them. Their only choice either to keep quiet, leave public life or join BJP. if they choose last option they are demonized by same secularist parties as traitor to Muslims.

    Salman Rushdie also found that for all his liking of Nehruvian vision he was not allowed to enter India during Rajiv Gandhi’s time.

    I think in Pakistan also the situation is same, as it also has large number of poor neighborhood.

    • Death be upon you for what you have written here. Uncivilised people like you have no right to live on the face of this beautiful planet earth.

  3. It is now the turn for Lord Nazir to repent for the entire period of his remaining life. However, Ms Zaman also cannot be absolved of the blemish of letting the people to address their pleas on a quid pro quo basis even if he had solved her problem. She should have trusted the “real” Lord unflinchingly.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular