Men walk on the debris at the site of a passenger plane crash in a residential area near an airport in Karachi, Pakistan on Friday. | ANI
Men walk on the debris at the site of a passenger plane crash in a residential area near an airport in Karachi, Pakistan on Friday. | ANI
Text Size:

New Delhi/Karachi: Investigators have zeroed in on pilot error as one of the primary reasons — if not the only cause — why a Pakistan International Airlines Corp. plane crashed into a Karachi neighborhood last month, killing all but two of the 99 people on board, people with knowledge of the matter said.

It appears the landing gear wasn’t deployed when the Airbus SE A320 jet touched the runway in its first approach, and there was no communication from the cockpit on whether the aircraft was trying to land on its belly, the people said, asking not to be identified because details of the probe are confidential. Both the airline, known as PIA, and the planemaker are pushing for an initial report to be made public as soon as possible, so that mechanical failure can be ruled out, they said.

Such an outcome would largely clear Airbus and engine maker CFM, a joint venture between General Electric Co. and France’s Safran SA, of any significant contribution to the tragedy. While finding pilot error would absolve PIA of maintenance or mechanical mistakes, it would also shove pilot training and procedures into the spotlight as the airline takes to the skies after a two-month lockdown.

France’s air safety investigator, the Bureau d’Enquetes et d’Analyses, successfully downloaded the jet’s flight data and cockpit voice recordings this week, which will help investigators understand what went on inside the plane as it hit the runway midway with the wheels still up, grinding along on its two engines at a speed of more than 200 miles per hour (322 kilometers per hour.)

A spokesman for BEA said Pakistani, Airbus and Safran teams will be leaving tonight after work downloading and decoding the data was completed. Analysis of the data will continue and the Pakistani authorities will communicate the findings when ready. He declined to comment on the reasons for the crash. A Safran spokeswoman declined to comment.

Officials at the air traffic control tower didn’t warn the pilots about the plane’s landing gear, even though those in the tower should have seen it wasn’t deployed, the people said. The plane wasn’t instructed to change its frequency to communicate with the tower directly, one of the people said.

The ATC, however, did warn the pilots multiple times about their speed and altitude as the jet was coming in to land but the warnings were ignored.

Prime Minister Imran Khan’s administration expects to make the initial report public by June 22, a month into the crash. The final report should be ready in 4-5 months, aviation minister Ghulam Murtaza Khan said in a briefing on June 4. – Bloomberg


Also read: Why PIA Airbus crash has reignited questions about viability of the airline


 

ThePrint is now on Telegram. For the best reports & opinion on politics, governance and more, subscribe to ThePrint on Telegram.

Subscribe to our YouTube channel.

6 Comments Share Your Views

6 COMMENTS

  1. یہ سب بکواس ہیں جب موت کا ٹائم اتا ہیں تو اپکوں کوئی نہیں روک سکتا یہ سب بہانے بن جاتھے ہیں۔ اپنے اللہ پر بروساں رکوں۔

  2. On first approach, the landing gears were down and locked properly, however, due to high rate of decent and higher speed master warning for flap speed excedence was constantly sounding, aircraft passed rwy threshold at speed in excess of 200 kts, with this high speed pilots were unable to touch down in the specified area, after realizing that aircraft won’t be able to stop in remaining rwy, Capt. Decided to conduct a Go Around, it is quite a possibility here that after capt. Announcement of GA, first officer retracted the landing gears and flaps prematurely and TOGA power was still establishing, this caused the aircraft to sink and with landing gears up, aircraft landed on engines. …with impact from rwy at several places, both engines were damaged and failed to produce sustainable flight soon, hence the crash.

  3. I think it’s a shame this website is desperately speculating amidst ongoing investigation. If there’s a bit of professionalism in you, please delete this content for sake of all those who lost their lives and their families. Thank you!

  4. Just close your mouth and stop falling for the tricks of PIA. Pilot fault pilot fault, has PIA ever taken responsibility of any of their many many crashes? They need to shut down, restart their airline with new safety and maintenance measures. If they can’t do that; to hell with them.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here