'Both judiciary & media are foundational pillars of democracy, a basic feature of our Constitution. For a liberal democracy to thrive, both must supplement each other,' says the top court.
Wikimedia Foundation was fined with 3 million roubles ($36,854). The owners previously criticized penalties as attempt to limit free and reliable sources of information in Russia.
Audience data shows there are now more fans outside South Korea than at home. Like hip hop, there’s no reason why K-Pop can’t have a similarly inclusive trajectory while staying true to its core.
Research paper, however, finds lowest indebtedness level among Muslims at 12.3% & highest among Hindus at 14.9%. Overall national financial inclusion level at 87.2%, indebtedness at 14.7%.
Fresh details of operation conducted by IAF, Army have come out in gazette notification giving citations of those who were awarded Vir Chakra for their bravery.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
Wikipedia is a mouthpiece of the liberal-secular gang. It’s take on any socio-economic issue or politics reeks of Leftist ideological bias. It never was and cannot ever be a reliable source of information.
If it at all wishes to redeem itself, it must publish the identity of the editors of any page on that page itself. But it would never do that.
Wikipedia has always been a propaganda tool for the Left-liberal cabal. Even a cursory glance at the Wikipedia pages on Modi, BJP or RSS proves that. It seems to have been lifted straight out of a communist party manifesto. Right since the very beginning, it has been a ideologically tilted mouthpiece of the global Left-liberal mafia.
Wikipedia, if it genuinely wishes to bat for transparency and neutrality, must make public the identity of the editors of any article/page.
Wikipedia is a mouthpiece of the liberal-secular gang. It’s take on any socio-economic issue or politics reeks of Leftist ideological bias. It never was and cannot ever be a reliable source of information.
If it at all wishes to redeem itself, it must publish the identity of the editors of any page on that page itself. But it would never do that.
Wikipedia has always been a propaganda tool for the Left-liberal cabal. Even a cursory glance at the Wikipedia pages on Modi, BJP or RSS proves that. It seems to have been lifted straight out of a communist party manifesto. Right since the very beginning, it has been a ideologically tilted mouthpiece of the global Left-liberal mafia.
Wikipedia, if it genuinely wishes to bat for transparency and neutrality, must make public the identity of the editors of any article/page.