The Joint Parliamentary Committee is likely to submit its report to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla on 29 January, first day of Budget Session. Oppn members has questioned the 'hurry'.
The govt found it necessary to assess the functioning of WAMSI portal as several states are unable to provide accurate information about waqf properties, it is learnt.
Reacting to allegations of bias, BJP’s Jagdambika Pal said he would resign as chairperson of JPC on Waqf (Amendment) Bill if panel members felt he was treating them unfairly.
As Jharkhand polls approach, VHP has written to joint committee on waqf bill, requesting provisions in law to ensure waqf boards don't 'violate' constitutional protections for STs.
Those opposed to the Bill must understand that this is a matter about management of real estate. It's crucial to free waqf from the clutches of select people.
The Diljala Aashiq’s playlist today consists of Ed Sheeran, Anuv Jain, Jubin Nautiyal, and Prateek Kuhad. But their patron saint hasn’t changed. It’s still Ajay Devgn.
As devastated farmers begin to come to terms with the fallout, 4 lakh hectares of land under paddy cultivation across state is flooded. Punjab is among the biggest contributors to PDS.
New Delhi: Army chief General Upendra Dwivedi has strongly backed the idea of theaterisation, saying it is inevitable and the need of the hour.
Speaking...
In its toughest time in decades because of floods, Punjab would’ve expected PM Modi to visit. If he has the time for a Bihar tour, why not a short visit to next-door Punjab?
It seems very strange that only the changes proposed by one party were accepted by the JPC. Surely every pary has good ideas that can make the bill more meaningful. The process shows a poor and partisan mindsent at the outset. Perhaps our lawmakers should realize that they are not each others enemies. Even given the poor behaviour of the members from opposition, surely there were good ideas from that end too. Saying that a vote was taken on each idea rings hollow if it is predetmined how one should vote. It thus appears that this exercise was more agenda driven and not for the overall good of the society. This is sad news.
It seems very strange that only the changes proposed by one party were accepted by the JPC. Surely every pary has good ideas that can make the bill more meaningful. The process shows a poor and partisan mindsent at the outset. Perhaps our lawmakers should realize that they are not each others enemies. Even given the poor behaviour of the members from opposition, surely there were good ideas from that end too. Saying that a vote was taken on each idea rings hollow if it is predetmined how one should vote. It thus appears that this exercise was more agenda driven and not for the overall good of the society. This is sad news.