Anchors such as Navika Kumar, Arnab Goswami, Zakka Jacob, and Vasudha Venugopal held lengthy discussions on Ranveer Allahbadia. CNN-News18 devoted three debates to him in a single night.
With the focus on ‘Rituals, Reverences, Rites,’ news channels barely have time for other stories. The Delhi Assembly election campaign occasionally peeks in and out.
Midway through 2024, Hindi and English news channels found their sense of balance. Once Congress lost Haryana and Maharashtra, they went back to openly supporting the Modi govt.
For TV news this week, ‘Allu Arjun vs Revanth Reddy’ was a clash of the titans of Telangana politics and Tollywood—and they were not going to miss out on any of the action.
The heartbreaking death of babies in the Jhansi hospital was major news—for one day. Manipur doesn’t even get a headline on most days. It's all about Maharashtra and Jharkhand elections.
Many Congress leaders would regret their words. From Pawan ‘Jalebi’ Khera to Supriya Shrinate, who told News 24 she would change her name if BJP wins more than '15-20 seats' in Haryana.
'Your children died right before your eyes?' an ANI reporter asked a woman. Such insensitive reporting of the ‘UP Stampede Horror’ was as shocking as the indifference of the organisers of the satsang.
When RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat commented on the Opposition not being an enemy and called for its perspectives to be respected, he could have been addressing the media as much as the politicians.
The Supreme Court’s judgment pushes the conversation in the right direction, but it does not resolve the full range of structural issues that determine how tribunals work on the ground.
The Centre is considering an increase in the National Company Law Tribunal's bench capacity, while the Standing Committee of Finance suggests fast-track courts.
The helicopters produced by Lockheed Martin are known as ‘submarine hunters’. India ordered 24 of these aircraft in 2020 to replace the Sea King helicopters. 15 have been delivered till date.
The India-South Africa series-defining fact is the catastrophic decline of Indian red ball cricket where a visiting team can mock us with the 'grovel' word.
The Opinion piece bring about some good points, including why highlight the crass comments and publicize it further.
But one thing I don’t at all agree with is the last section, where the author is questioning the call for regulation. I was surprised by that because I felt there is no logical argument/ comparison there.
Af fas as I know, The TV and Print media are owned by a group of people, who along with the editor take care of the self-regulation part of it. Editors, especially have experience in the field.
Can we expect the same from the editor of Ranveer or Samay’s shows? Do they even have an editor who looks into these things? If so, shouldn’t they have edited the creepy comments from Ranveer in the first place?
I believe they only look at what kind of content gives them the maximum views and clicks.
Or do we expect youtube to self-regulate? The amount of content that’s dumped on YouTube makes it almost impossible. Unless there is a law, there is no incentive for YouTube to even try!
How come this was not considered when the author wrote that last paragraph??? Please help me understand if I am missing something
enough over analysis of this crappy pervert //Hang all of them along with this writer .
The Opinion piece bring about some good points, including why highlight the crass comments and publicize it further.
But one thing I don’t at all agree with is the last section, where the author is questioning the call for regulation. I was surprised by that because I felt there is no logical argument/ comparison there.
Af fas as I know, The TV and Print media are owned by a group of people, who along with the editor take care of the self-regulation part of it. Editors, especially have experience in the field.
Can we expect the same from the editor of Ranveer or Samay’s shows? Do they even have an editor who looks into these things? If so, shouldn’t they have edited the creepy comments from Ranveer in the first place?
I believe they only look at what kind of content gives them the maximum views and clicks.
Or do we expect youtube to self-regulate? The amount of content that’s dumped on YouTube makes it almost impossible. Unless there is a law, there is no incentive for YouTube to even try!
How come this was not considered when the author wrote that last paragraph??? Please help me understand if I am missing something