Solicitor General Tushar Mehta said the UP govt was taking steps to curb Covid in the state, but to have a 'lockdown by a judicial order may not be right'.
The petition by Delhi Prosecutors Welfare Association (DPWA) sought quashing of Delhi govt's 24 June notification appointing the SPPs, including Solicitor General Tushar Mehta.
A spat ensued between Tushar Mehta and Delhi govt counsel Rahul Mehra when the latter objected to the solicitor general’s presence in a bail-related case.
Mehta’s categorisation of some courts as institutions ‘running parallel governments’ is a signal to the subordinate judiciary. SC should have stopped him.
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the court that Delhi LG had authorised him to represent Delhi Police. Kejriwal govt’s counsel Rahul Mehra disputed this.
The court also sought the investigating agency's response on the Congress leader's anticipatory bail plea and listed the matter for further hearing on 3 July.
Indian judiciary has a corrosive imbalance between the bar and the bench. Those who supervise the district judiciary do so without the lived experience that is essential for meaningful reform.
November exports to the US saw 10% growth from the previous month. Overall, in the first 8 months this fiscal, the merchandise exports to the US touched has touched $59bn.
Of the total package, $649 million will be utilised for additional hardware, software, and support services, and the remaining for Major Defence Equipment (MDE).
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
I want to understand on what legal basis the courts are taking administrative and policy decisions.
It does not have a moral obligation but to uphold rule and letter of law.
No where in the constitution it provides courts with executive powers.
On top of that mr Mehta should be calling court order as unconstitutional instead of lovey dovey this is not right this is partially right.
If this trend continues we may end up replacing constitutionally elected government with undemocratic unelected judiciary running roughshod over democratic institutions instead of saving them.
Time and again it shown eagerness in its overreach.
It must be stopped to preserve the democracy in the nation.
I want to understand on what legal basis the courts are taking administrative and policy decisions.
It does not have a moral obligation but to uphold rule and letter of law.
No where in the constitution it provides courts with executive powers.
On top of that mr Mehta should be calling court order as unconstitutional instead of lovey dovey this is not right this is partially right.
If this trend continues we may end up replacing constitutionally elected government with undemocratic unelected judiciary running roughshod over democratic institutions instead of saving them.
Time and again it shown eagerness in its overreach.
It must be stopped to preserve the democracy in the nation.