Finance minister Jaitley writes on legal affairs, law minister Prasad speaks on defence matters, and defence minister Sitharaman holds forth on finance affairs.
In less than a decade, Fayaz Kagzi went from being a B.Ed student in Maharashtra to Lashkar recruiter and finally ended up dying for the ISIS cause in Saudi Arabia
Minorities panel have asked the JNU administration to reply whether there is any concept paper or proposal to start a course on "Islamic Terrorism".The proposed course has been opposed by sections of teachers and students at the JNU.
Without naming Mumbai attack mastermind and militant organisations operating in the country with impunity, Sharif said: Militant organisations are active in Pakistan.
Here's what's happening across the border: Pakistan sets new world record by planting the most number of trees in a day, and the country is now willing to train military troops of other Islamic countries.
The IndiGo crisis is nothing short of a threat to India’s stability. Could it be an experiment? Can this happen in any other crucial sector like power or railways?
November exports to the US saw 10% growth from the previous month. Overall, in the first 8 months this fiscal, the merchandise exports to the US touched has touched $59bn.
It is argued that India-Israel ties are moving from buyer–seller dynamic to one focused on joint development & manufacturing partnership, a shift 'more durable' than traditional arms sales.
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
No same person thinks ISIS appeared out of nowhere or that Amerikastan is seriously interested in fighting it. The conditions for its existence were created in the late 1990s when the Jordanian thug Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was released from jail and quietly sent to Iraq by the Hashemite monarchy to sabotage the Saddam Hussein government. Al Zarqawi found no support among Iraqi Arab Sunnis but shelter among the Kurds (yes, the vet Kurds who are allegedly now anti ISIS). After the Bushist invasion, with Iraqi society crumbling, al Zarqawi came down to Baghdad and Anbar province to start his own version of Al Qaeda, which was only later recognised by Osama bin Laden. This al Qaeda franchise began attacking, not the invaders, but Shia and secular Sunnis, starting a civil conflict that undermined the anti imperialist resistance war.
By the time al Zarqawi was killed, Iraqi society had been so devastated that the imperial occupation could claim that it had to remain in the country to maintain security, and it kept on doing that until 2011. Contrary to what this article alleges, Obama had no intention of withdrawing forces – he was compelled to do so because of the Status Of Forces Agreement signed by George W Bush and the Iraqi government refusing to continue to permit American occupation troops to be immune to Iraqi law for the crimes they committed.
It’s pretty interesting that this article fails to mention that in 2011 the American government began pouring weapons into Syria, just as Qatar and Saudi Barbaria did money, and Turkey sent in terrorists in what was called the Jihad Express. They did so even though the American DIA reported in 2012 (the declassified report has been available online for three years) that they knew that the jihadis dominated the “opposition” to the legitimate government of Syria, and intended to set up a Caliphate in the country and Iraq. It was from Syria that hardened jihadis with arms flooded into Iraq. ISIS didn’t come out of nowhere; it was created and fostered by the Imperialist States of Amerikastan.
That’s still going on to this day. America did nothing when ISIS convoys drove across hundreds of kilometres of desert to take Palmyra in Syria in 2015 because that would be “helping Assad”. Its zionist master does nothing when ISIS occupies an enclave on its (illegally occupied) Golan border. America’s NATO ally Turkey did nothing for years as ISIS convoys brought oil from Syria to sell in Turkey – oil which America’s EU vassals bought because they’d authorised buying oil from “Syrian rebels” in 2012. None of this is unknown.
Nor is the fate of the ISIS contingent in Raqqa unknown. Many thousands of them were permitted to leave with all their weapons, and it’s right on video. Why, assuming Amerikastan is really interested in defeating ISIS, not maintaining it as a useful tool to pressure governments and a great excuse to maintain military occupation?
Not that I’m saying ISIS doesn’t have its own agenda. Of course it does. It’s however more than happy to play along in the short run, just like al Qaeda was in Afghanistan, Libya, etc.
No same person thinks ISIS appeared out of nowhere or that Amerikastan is seriously interested in fighting it. The conditions for its existence were created in the late 1990s when the Jordanian thug Abu Musab al-Zarqawi was released from jail and quietly sent to Iraq by the Hashemite monarchy to sabotage the Saddam Hussein government. Al Zarqawi found no support among Iraqi Arab Sunnis but shelter among the Kurds (yes, the vet Kurds who are allegedly now anti ISIS). After the Bushist invasion, with Iraqi society crumbling, al Zarqawi came down to Baghdad and Anbar province to start his own version of Al Qaeda, which was only later recognised by Osama bin Laden. This al Qaeda franchise began attacking, not the invaders, but Shia and secular Sunnis, starting a civil conflict that undermined the anti imperialist resistance war.
By the time al Zarqawi was killed, Iraqi society had been so devastated that the imperial occupation could claim that it had to remain in the country to maintain security, and it kept on doing that until 2011. Contrary to what this article alleges, Obama had no intention of withdrawing forces – he was compelled to do so because of the Status Of Forces Agreement signed by George W Bush and the Iraqi government refusing to continue to permit American occupation troops to be immune to Iraqi law for the crimes they committed.
It’s pretty interesting that this article fails to mention that in 2011 the American government began pouring weapons into Syria, just as Qatar and Saudi Barbaria did money, and Turkey sent in terrorists in what was called the Jihad Express. They did so even though the American DIA reported in 2012 (the declassified report has been available online for three years) that they knew that the jihadis dominated the “opposition” to the legitimate government of Syria, and intended to set up a Caliphate in the country and Iraq. It was from Syria that hardened jihadis with arms flooded into Iraq. ISIS didn’t come out of nowhere; it was created and fostered by the Imperialist States of Amerikastan.
That’s still going on to this day. America did nothing when ISIS convoys drove across hundreds of kilometres of desert to take Palmyra in Syria in 2015 because that would be “helping Assad”. Its zionist master does nothing when ISIS occupies an enclave on its (illegally occupied) Golan border. America’s NATO ally Turkey did nothing for years as ISIS convoys brought oil from Syria to sell in Turkey – oil which America’s EU vassals bought because they’d authorised buying oil from “Syrian rebels” in 2012. None of this is unknown.
Nor is the fate of the ISIS contingent in Raqqa unknown. Many thousands of them were permitted to leave with all their weapons, and it’s right on video. Why, assuming Amerikastan is really interested in defeating ISIS, not maintaining it as a useful tool to pressure governments and a great excuse to maintain military occupation?
Not that I’m saying ISIS doesn’t have its own agenda. Of course it does. It’s however more than happy to play along in the short run, just like al Qaeda was in Afghanistan, Libya, etc.