Punjab minister Navjot Singh Sidhu is facing a sedition complaint for allegedly insulting the Indian Army by hugging the Pakistan army chief at Imran...
On the first episode of Two Much With Kajol and Twinkle, Aamir Khan and Salman Khan were confronted with another hypocrisy: age gaps. And they didn't come out looking good.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
While the IAF remains committed to the Tejas programme and has placed orders for 180 Tejas Mk1A, the force is eagerly waiting for the Tejas Mk 2 version.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
The 1962 judgment of the apex court is being violated with impunity. In the 1920s, Mahatma Gandhi had promised that a free, independent India would scrap the law on sedition. Successive governments have loved to have such a blunt instrument at their disposal. Chanting slogans, waving black flags, now giving someone a hug are being brought within the purview of this law, which deals actually with treason in a violent sense. The sensible course of action would be for the apex court, taking judicial note of the manner in which this law has been applied, especially since its 1962 judgment, to rescind the section as being unconstitutional. It would be open to Parliament to pass a fresh law that conforms to its various judgments on the subject. Even if the law stands, no harm in people using a little common sense before taking recourse to it.
The 1962 judgment of the apex court is being violated with impunity. In the 1920s, Mahatma Gandhi had promised that a free, independent India would scrap the law on sedition. Successive governments have loved to have such a blunt instrument at their disposal. Chanting slogans, waving black flags, now giving someone a hug are being brought within the purview of this law, which deals actually with treason in a violent sense. The sensible course of action would be for the apex court, taking judicial note of the manner in which this law has been applied, especially since its 1962 judgment, to rescind the section as being unconstitutional. It would be open to Parliament to pass a fresh law that conforms to its various judgments on the subject. Even if the law stands, no harm in people using a little common sense before taking recourse to it.