In 1988, Bal Thackeray said Aurangabad would be called Sambhajinagar after Chhatrapati Shivaji’s son. Now, his son and Maharashtra CM Uddhav is pushing for it again.
The Indian planning system did not encourage individuals based on ‘what they knew’, but on ‘whom they knew’. Many left for countries that recognised their talent.
The new law, which the government has framed as a moral duty, forced major platforms like Dream11 & Zupee to shut operations, wiping out hundreds of crores in market capitalisation.
Joint Doctrine for Special Forces Operations, released Wednesday, also outlines plans for the future expansion of AFSOD and the creation of Joint Service Training Institutes.
Putin sees this as a victory. Europeans have decided to deal with Trump on his terms for the sake of the larger Western alliance. We look at the lessons for us in India.
Shiv sena should go ahead and rename it. Conress will be wiped out. And it will lead to the rise of MIM. Which will lead to further consolidation of hindu vote. GOOD
I don’t hold much hope for Shivsena.
They ditched Khaire – the most consistent and loyal servant of the dynasty to accommodate Abdul Sattar who actually helped defeat Khaire in the last Lok Sabha election. He did that by shifting his voter base to AIMIM. That was literally stabbing Khaire in the back. Yet Sattar is still a minister in the cabinet and Khaire is not an MP.
A country which prides itself in honoring plunderers marauders rapists of her citizenry by naming cities after cities on their name is just shameful.
Sambhaji nagar is an apt name whose sacrifice should be honored and brought before public in general who are ignorant in eulogizing and celebrating their marauders plunderers and rapists.
1. Both Emperor Aurangzeb and Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj have NO historical link to the city.
2. Renaming is an expensive process, the money will be better utilized for fighting the pandemic, as Maharashtra really needs that.
3. If politicians are worried about history then they should rename it to Khadki. This will reignite a link between the city’s historical greatness.
4. Only Malik Ambar deserves any recognition when it comes to Aurangabad, he founded the city and the city was at its height of greatness under him.
If congress has strong conviction that Aurangabad should not be renamed, it should withdraw the support. No point, whimpering against while staying in the coalition and enjoying ministerships. This no-good Shivsena should change names of not only Aurangabad, but also of Ahmednagar.
Many people have migrated to India in the last couple of millennia, such as sythians, parthians, bractrian greeks, huns, parsis, nestorian and syrian christians. None of them want to establish their hegemony. We have this problem only with Muslims. Any idea why does this happen. Simple. Islam is a political ideology masquarading as religion. They have to keep fighting until Dar ul Islam is established.
‘They have to keep fighting until Dar ul Islam is established’
And then they keep on fighting between themselves – calling Shias and Ahmedis Kaafir.
Killing all including Sunnis for not being ‘true’ muslims (whatever that means).
Shiv sena should go ahead and rename it. Conress will be wiped out. And it will lead to the rise of MIM. Which will lead to further consolidation of hindu vote. GOOD
I don’t hold much hope for Shivsena.
They ditched Khaire – the most consistent and loyal servant of the dynasty to accommodate Abdul Sattar who actually helped defeat Khaire in the last Lok Sabha election. He did that by shifting his voter base to AIMIM. That was literally stabbing Khaire in the back. Yet Sattar is still a minister in the cabinet and Khaire is not an MP.
This is a welcome initiative.
A country which prides itself in honoring plunderers marauders rapists of her citizenry by naming cities after cities on their name is just shameful.
Sambhaji nagar is an apt name whose sacrifice should be honored and brought before public in general who are ignorant in eulogizing and celebrating their marauders plunderers and rapists.
Shane on Hindus for such a slave mentality for so long , still more then half of Indian cities have Invaded Muslims name .
You sound biased..print
That’s just useless for the following reasons:
1. Both Emperor Aurangzeb and Chatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj have NO historical link to the city.
2. Renaming is an expensive process, the money will be better utilized for fighting the pandemic, as Maharashtra really needs that.
3. If politicians are worried about history then they should rename it to Khadki. This will reignite a link between the city’s historical greatness.
4. Only Malik Ambar deserves any recognition when it comes to Aurangabad, he founded the city and the city was at its height of greatness under him.
Malik Amber did not create the city. The town was already there. He just made it the new capital.
Indians are fed up with this type of nonsense from secus.
It is time they catch Samjhota Express and give benefit of their wisdom to our Pakistani brothers.
Congress will not withdraw support as ruling Maharashtra has economic implications .
SHARAD pawar will not withdraw support as he is afraid Ajit pawar will join BJP.
SHIVSENA will follow it’s agenda as it knows HINDUS are watching if they are becoming SECULAR or are on the side of infidels.
Journalists are watching everybody hoping they can become middlemen again.
If congress has strong conviction that Aurangabad should not be renamed, it should withdraw the support. No point, whimpering against while staying in the coalition and enjoying ministerships. This no-good Shivsena should change names of not only Aurangabad, but also of Ahmednagar.
Many people have migrated to India in the last couple of millennia, such as sythians, parthians, bractrian greeks, huns, parsis, nestorian and syrian christians. None of them want to establish their hegemony. We have this problem only with Muslims. Any idea why does this happen. Simple. Islam is a political ideology masquarading as religion. They have to keep fighting until Dar ul Islam is established.
‘They have to keep fighting until Dar ul Islam is established’
And then they keep on fighting between themselves – calling Shias and Ahmedis Kaafir.
Killing all including Sunnis for not being ‘true’ muslims (whatever that means).