The multi-state co-operative bank has been under RBI restriction since 23 September, after the central bank found huge under-reporting of loans & non-performing assets.
The information may be required after RBI made changes to banking law that allows selected non-residents to open accounts & own property, Times of India report says.
The RBI implemented a series of five consecutive rate cuts starting February this year by a cumulative 1.35%, a move, governor Shaktikanta Das says, had surprised markets early in the year.
Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman said RBI's Committee of the Central Board had indirectly agreed to electoral bonds being issued if done by SBI in a October 2017 meeting.
On 6 December 1948, TT Krishnamachari spoke in the Constituent Assembly during a debate on Article 19, supporting it as it is, including how it's framed in the matter of religion.
Extreme weather events have impacted 50% of corporate respondents to a recent survey. This underlines the importance of significant action now to increase climate resilience.
Iran used Shahab-3, along with Fattah-1 hypersonic missiles, to attack Israel after the killing of Hezbollah leader Hasan Nasrallah in air strikes on Lebanon's Beirut.
How come Indonesia, Malaysia, Turkey and Sri Lanka remain constitutional, democratic and stable despite Islam and Buddhism respectively, but Pakistan, Bangladesh and Myanmar don’t?
Either Mr. Amish is a first-rate liar or the census officials of Bangladesh and Pakistan are. According to census of Pakistan (West Pakistan before 1971), the percentage of non-Muslims was 3.44 percent in 1951 and 3.7 percent in 1998 (latest data available). So there was probably extinction-level persecution in 1947-51 period but data indicates that such persecution has not been seen after 1951. In East Pakistan, the percentage of non-Muslims was 9.6 percent in 2009 (latest data). Can 9.6 percent population be reconciled with extinction-level persecution? Sounds mutually contradictory to me.
Also, did the extinction-level persecution in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh stop on December 2014? What is the proof for that? By the way, Indian government had said there is no religious persecution in Bangladesh under Sheikh Hasina rule. If my memory and online sources are true, Sheikh Hasina assumed power in 2009. So shouldn’t the date be reset? And if Bangladesh under Hasina is good, shouldn’t the people be sent back? Same logic for post-Taliban Afghanistan.
The logic behind creation of India indicated that it was best suited to be a “Hindu” rashtra. But the founding fathers decided not to make it secular and the Supreme Court has declared secularism to be a fundamental feature of the constitution. If the BJP wants to change the historical anomaly it should take the bull by the horns and declare the same rather than go for hypocritical and lie-laden bills like CAA. I say this because I believe hypocritical behaviour is the biggest reason for India’s backwardness.
Either Mr. Amish is a first-rate liar or the census officials of Bangladesh and Pakistan are. According to census of Pakistan (West Pakistan before 1971), the percentage of non-Muslims was 3.44 percent in 1951 and 3.7 percent in 1998 (latest data available). So there was probably extinction-level persecution in 1947-51 period but data indicates that such persecution has not been seen after 1951. In East Pakistan, the percentage of non-Muslims was 9.6 percent in 2009 (latest data). Can 9.6 percent population be reconciled with extinction-level persecution? Sounds mutually contradictory to me.
Also, did the extinction-level persecution in Pakistan, Afghanistan and Bangladesh stop on December 2014? What is the proof for that? By the way, Indian government had said there is no religious persecution in Bangladesh under Sheikh Hasina rule. If my memory and online sources are true, Sheikh Hasina assumed power in 2009. So shouldn’t the date be reset? And if Bangladesh under Hasina is good, shouldn’t the people be sent back? Same logic for post-Taliban Afghanistan.
The logic behind creation of India indicated that it was best suited to be a “Hindu” rashtra. But the founding fathers decided not to make it secular and the Supreme Court has declared secularism to be a fundamental feature of the constitution. If the BJP wants to change the historical anomaly it should take the bull by the horns and declare the same rather than go for hypocritical and lie-laden bills like CAA. I say this because I believe hypocritical behaviour is the biggest reason for India’s backwardness.