Justice Shukla had allegedly defied restraint orders passed by the Supreme Court last year to permit private colleges to admit students for the 2017-18 academic session.
In a series of letters, Chief Justice of India Ranjan Gogoi has sought increasing the retirement age to 65 as well boosting the strength of judges to deal with the backlog of cases.
In a recent survey of law school admissions officers, 94% said the current political climate in the US played at least a moderate role in the increase.
New CPI series will take 2024 as base year, will provide more accurate measure of inflation, spending on digital services. Expected to enhance representation and reliability, says Saurabh Garg.
The agreement, signed after meeting between Rajnath and US Secretary of War Pete Hegseth on sidelines of ADMM-Plus in Kuala Lumpur, aims to deepen bilateral ties in the critical sector.
On 21 Oct, a buzz went up that the govt had released full list of gallantry award recipients along with Op Sindoor citations. I put an AI caddy on the job. It took me into a never-ending rabbit hole.
It’s a fashion for librandus to seed conflicts between the judiciary and the government. In healthy democracy judiciary and the government are required to support each other in the national interest otherwise both would become the playground of anti nationals that India has in abundance.
You want to avoid a visit from the ED by being prudent, eh ;)?
Indian judiciary has no back bone. It has no spine (connected to the brain) either, as it gives judgements which defy principles of justice and do not uphold the rule of law. They do not protect individual rights. So very little can be hoped for from the new worthy also. ?
CJI Gogoi was not just a disappointment, he seemed to lack a spine in the interest of justice. The new CJI will most probably be the same based on history of not writing judgements in most of his cases.
I think this will complete the circle of India’s democratic institutions all failing at the same time.
It’s a fashion for librandus to seed conflicts between the judiciary and the government. In healthy democracy judiciary and the government are required to support each other in the national interest otherwise both would become the playground of anti nationals that India has in abundance.
The initials of the first anti -national are ak.d.
Only a thrice filtered idiot can hold your point of view.
A lot of reconstructive surgery is required. Prudence deters one from dilating further.
You want to avoid a visit from the ED by being prudent, eh ;)?
Indian judiciary has no back bone. It has no spine (connected to the brain) either, as it gives judgements which defy principles of justice and do not uphold the rule of law. They do not protect individual rights. So very little can be hoped for from the new worthy also. ?
Agreed. 100%.
CJI Gogoi was not just a disappointment, he seemed to lack a spine in the interest of justice. The new CJI will most probably be the same based on history of not writing judgements in most of his cases.
I think this will complete the circle of India’s democratic institutions all failing at the same time.
You think you are the only intelligent. Lol
No Rajvirji. As long as people like you are there, others are just simple idiots by comparison. LOL, and very loud.