scorecardresearch
Monday, August 18, 2025
TopicRam Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute

Topic: Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid dispute

Supreme Court reserves order on Ayodhya title dispute case

The Supreme Court said it was conscious of the gravity of the Ayodhya dispute and outcome of mediation.

On Ayodhya dispute case, top court says can’t change what Babur did, must focus on present

A five-judge bench said the Ayodhya title dispute case is not just about property but also about mind, heart and healing, if possible. 

Supreme Court to hear Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute case on 4 January

The matter is listed before a bench comprising Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justice S K Kaul.

Khattar’s namaz remark contradicts what Hindutva groups have argued for in the Ayodhya case

A Supreme Court judgment in 1994 in the Ayodhya case had ruled that while a Muslim can pray practically anywhere, the site of a Hindu temple is set in stone.

CDs, video cassettes, books among mountain of evidence in front of SC in Ayodhya case

A total of 553 documentary exhibits have been submitted to the court, running into 8,000 pages. The SC registry accepts video evidence in CD format.

On Camera

Postcards from Hyderabad—stories Europeans told about the city

For all their colonial underpinnings, postcards from Hyderabad also inadvertently preserve a trace of local memory: a glimpse of a street, a face, a forgotten name.

Navigating Trump’s tariffs is no child’s play. Indian toymakers are losing out on orders, enquiries

Indian toymakers are now exploring new markets, but they want govt to negotiate a trade deal with US soon, introduce incentives and subsidies to make the industry more competitive.

What is Project Sudarshan Chakra, announced by Modi from ramparts of Red Fort

The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.

War of IAF, PAF doctrines: As Pakistan obsesses over numbers, India embraces risk, wins

Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?