The anti-Hindu and anti-Congress narrative do not completely define Punjab's militancy movement. This anecdote shows why the sage of militancy is layered.
Sikh groups in Canada, USA and UK openly support a separate Sikh nation, and Indian security agencies believe they are trying to revive militancy in Punjab.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
A Great Scoop by The Print, The book Sounds like a very good Read and Gives a Different Angle To The Punjab Militancy Decade Of Terror where putting aside canard/fake propaganda spread by persons inside/outside the state people did come across the human side of some gun toting militants and policemen/security forces and even some politicians who were active during the 1980s-early 1990s timeline.
Only Kale Kachay walae dacos frankensteins created by the then Indian Government indulged in loot and killing of Hindus in the guise of Sikhs thus giving Sikh independence movement implausibility among the masses. There is still general consensus among the common man of Punjab that the Punjab independence movement was for the benefit of common Punjabis who had been fooled by the Nehrus and Gandhis of India at the time of Partition of Punjab.
I m not going to blame game that who was responsible for this. May be congress could not assess that Jarnail singh became so powerful n such situation came after this
Militancy in Punjab is a phase of Independent History. Congress brought Bhindrawalan to defeat SAD but later Bhindrawalan was so powerful due to political shelter it made an integrated episode of Khalistan , Operation Blue star and militancy in Punjab in 80 n 90 .
hahaha..trying to humanize militants?
A Great Scoop by The Print, The book Sounds like a very good Read and Gives a Different Angle To The Punjab Militancy Decade Of Terror where putting aside canard/fake propaganda spread by persons inside/outside the state people did come across the human side of some gun toting militants and policemen/security forces and even some politicians who were active during the 1980s-early 1990s timeline.
Only Kale Kachay walae dacos frankensteins created by the then Indian Government indulged in loot and killing of Hindus in the guise of Sikhs thus giving Sikh independence movement implausibility among the masses. There is still general consensus among the common man of Punjab that the Punjab independence movement was for the benefit of common Punjabis who had been fooled by the Nehrus and Gandhis of India at the time of Partition of Punjab.
Stop lying
I m not going to blame game that who was responsible for this. May be congress could not assess that Jarnail singh became so powerful n such situation came after this
Militancy in Punjab is a phase of Independent History. Congress brought Bhindrawalan to defeat SAD but later Bhindrawalan was so powerful due to political shelter it made an integrated episode of Khalistan , Operation Blue star and militancy in Punjab in 80 n 90 .