Mamdani’s politics feels unusual compared to India’s current climate. He unapologetically foregrounds Muslim identity at a time when doing so in India invites scrutiny.
On 4 November 2025, NCLAT bench, comprising Chairperson Justice Ashok Bhushan and Member Arun Baroka, noted that WhatsApp and Meta are distinct legal entities.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
I look forward to the day when The Print in general, and D.K.Singh in particular, have anything positive to say about the BJP!
Wonder where all the balance in journalism has gone. Nowadays political inclinations imbue the style and content of articles penned by mainstream media columnists – and this guy is right in the thick of it!
Dialogue is possible only amongst two equals of intellectual capacities, getting elected is not the sign of that. For dialogue the other participants must have some what similar level of understanding, study and articulation on the subject, in absence of it there can only be monologue.
THE NEW TREND BLAME MODI FOR THE INADEQUASIES OF OTHER.
Yeah, tha tis where Modi does not measure up to. All the CMs are more educated than him. Period.
I would like D K Singh to go back to Nehruvian period and see what kind of dialog took place between the PM and the States, except for the monolog of his fortnightly letters to CMs which came with clockwork regularity. Before Indira Gandhi, CMs literally shivered in their dhotis. Rajiv Gandhi could dismiss the CM of a large State by making a statement before the Press int he airport. Regrettably, our Constitution, though said to be federal in structure, provides for stronger center, unlike the US constitution which vests more power in the States. I am not defending Modi. But, this has always been the case. Only during the coalition period between 1991 and 2014 did we see PMs genuflecting before the CMs who were regional satraps.
This is political article and hence this guy is spin master. For GST related issues GST council is the platform.
Everyone wants, they get what they want and that’s not the way things happen.
Everyone wants to get everything what they want through PM to show him poor light – but that does not help. There are bodies, institutions who work as checks and balances in a nation. We elect people to make laws and policies. Sadly, in a our country government is meant to deliver what “I” want and not “for all of us”.
I am worried the way trends are we are weakening legislature by seeking consent of SC on almost everything.
If there is Minister for some role we want PM to intervene.
For God’s sake it is a government and not king Modi who shall oblige to who pleases him.
Now a days, I do not read the article but the remarks, which are more precise and honest. They contradict and provide me with both veiw points.
Dear author, you please join the paatshala. It will cure you of your blinkered thinking.
I look forward to the day when The Print in general, and D.K.Singh in particular, have anything positive to say about the BJP!
Wonder where all the balance in journalism has gone. Nowadays political inclinations imbue the style and content of articles penned by mainstream media columnists – and this guy is right in the thick of it!
Dialogue is possible only amongst two equals of intellectual capacities, getting elected is not the sign of that. For dialogue the other participants must have some what similar level of understanding, study and articulation on the subject, in absence of it there can only be monologue.
THE NEW TREND BLAME MODI FOR THE INADEQUASIES OF OTHER.
“two equals of intellectuals capacities”!!!!
Yeah, tha tis where Modi does not measure up to. All the CMs are more educated than him. Period.
I would like D K Singh to go back to Nehruvian period and see what kind of dialog took place between the PM and the States, except for the monolog of his fortnightly letters to CMs which came with clockwork regularity. Before Indira Gandhi, CMs literally shivered in their dhotis. Rajiv Gandhi could dismiss the CM of a large State by making a statement before the Press int he airport. Regrettably, our Constitution, though said to be federal in structure, provides for stronger center, unlike the US constitution which vests more power in the States. I am not defending Modi. But, this has always been the case. Only during the coalition period between 1991 and 2014 did we see PMs genuflecting before the CMs who were regional satraps.
This is political article and hence this guy is spin master. For GST related issues GST council is the platform.
Everyone wants, they get what they want and that’s not the way things happen.
Everyone wants to get everything what they want through PM to show him poor light – but that does not help. There are bodies, institutions who work as checks and balances in a nation. We elect people to make laws and policies. Sadly, in a our country government is meant to deliver what “I” want and not “for all of us”.
I am worried the way trends are we are weakening legislature by seeking consent of SC on almost everything.
If there is Minister for some role we want PM to intervene.
For God’s sake it is a government and not king Modi who shall oblige to who pleases him.