In her letter to the CJI, the woman judge at the centre of the fresh judiciary-executive tussle says Karnataka judge P. Krishna Bhat’s behavour triggered ‘rumours and questions’
Modi govt hasn’t cleared the appointment of P. Krishna Bhat to the Karnataka HC, or the transfer of Justice D. Seshadri Naidu back to the Andhra & Telangana HC.
RJD, once a prominent representative of Mandal politics, now finds itself in a political era where welfare, good governance, and new aspirations are overshadowing old caste equations.
Without a Congress revival, there can be no challenge to the BJP pan-nationally. Modi’s party is growing, and almost entirely at the cost of the Congress.
Now I feel that so called liberal n anti modians have double standard with respect to allegations of woman,why they are adamant for appointment of a judge who is not found to be innocent is some thing suspicious.this show how the top court bosses want dictatorship in the name of independency inthe matter of judiciary. I wonder why govt did not come in open with facts n against attacks by these dictators
I don’t understand who is in a hurry to promote an accused judge. Let that case be registered and detailed enquiry take place and let’s give more dates and let’s prove the fact justice delayed is justice denied. Let all the judges understand the pain of a common man. Finally let the justice prevail and if found unfit don’t promote. There is no smoke with out a fire.
Transparency and fairness in judiciary is very important. Corruption in justice delivery system is in public domain now. Sanitization of the whole Judicial system including appointments is the need of the times. For judicial appointments, constitution of Indian Judicial Service similar to the Indian Civil service is the need of the hour.
This justification of ‘discrete enquiry’ is either courts do not fall under ‘workplace’ category or Vishakha guidelines do not apply to high and might lordships.
Krishna BHAT ,,,,,low Character has Been appointed as Judge..
Now I feel that so called liberal n anti modians have double standard with respect to allegations of woman,why they are adamant for appointment of a judge who is not found to be innocent is some thing suspicious.this show how the top court bosses want dictatorship in the name of independency inthe matter of judiciary. I wonder why govt did not come in open with facts n against attacks by these dictators
I don’t understand who is in a hurry to promote an accused judge. Let that case be registered and detailed enquiry take place and let’s give more dates and let’s prove the fact justice delayed is justice denied. Let all the judges understand the pain of a common man. Finally let the justice prevail and if found unfit don’t promote. There is no smoke with out a fire.
Transparency and fairness in judiciary is very important. Corruption in justice delivery system is in public domain now. Sanitization of the whole Judicial system including appointments is the need of the times. For judicial appointments, constitution of Indian Judicial Service similar to the Indian Civil service is the need of the hour.
The tussle between judiciary and executive has lead to the shortage of judges in Karnataka High Court, seriously affected the Litigants.
This justification of ‘discrete enquiry’ is either courts do not fall under ‘workplace’ category or Vishakha guidelines do not apply to high and might lordships.