Operation Sindoor is a series of missile attacks by Indian armed forces on nine terror targets in Pakistan and PoK in the early hours of 7 May 2025 in response to the Pahalgam terror attack.
Between 1:05 AM and 1:30 AM on 7 May, 2025, Indian armed forces struck 9 terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (Pok). This included the headquarters of Lashkar-e-Taiba in Muridke and Jaish-e-Mohammed in Bahawalpur. In a statement, the Indian government said its actions were “focused, measured and non-escalatory in nature” and that “no Pakistani military facilities have been targeted”.
Underlining the Pakistan link to the Pahalgam attack, the statement said India is “living up to the commitment that those responsible for this attack will be held accountable”.
Pakistan reacted to the precision strikes by sending in drone swarms into Indian border states, and launching missiles on military and civilian infrastructure in India. Indian armed forces responded by striking airbases in Pakistan. On 10 May, Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations (DGMO) called his Indian counterpart and the two agreed on an understanding to cease all military hostilities starting 5 pm that day.
If the journalists at The Print feel so strongly for stray dogs, why don’t they adopt them and give them a good life. Adopt these strays, feed them, take care of them and keep them at home.
Stray dogs pose a very serious threat to the safety and security of children and elderly. Across the country, death due to stray dog mauling has become a regular occurence. The less said about deaths due to rabies, the better.
In such a situation, society and government must put the safety and security of citizens first. The human being needs to be prioritized here over the animal.
What an asinine editorial take on the issue! This is what happens when people live in farmhouses and party at 5-star hotels. Totally devoid of any connection with ground realities.
The Print seems very hurt by Supreme Court’s order on removal of stray dogs from city streets.
What is puzzling is that The Print itself reported on several deaths of children and elderly due to mauling from stray dogs. And now, very conveniently, it puts the blame on the government. How is the government responsible if a stray dog bites a person?
In my residential complex, there are around 25 stray dogs. After 12pm, nobody dares to go out alone. It’s mandatory to go in groups. Else, there is inevitably harassment from these strays – many times bites too. The children and elderly are especially vulnerable.
One fails to understand how can the editorial board of The Print be so insensitive to the problems faced by the common man in their daily lives? Stray dogs are an absolute menace.
I personally believe that the solution lies in mass culling of stray dogs. Hope the Supreme Court judges will have the good sense to allow the municipal authorities to cull these strays.