Ambedkar regarded both Gandhi and Jinnah as suffering from ‘colossal egotism’, who made Indian politics a matter of their ‘personal quarrel’ and brought it to a standstill.
New Delhi: From Jawaharlal Nehru and Vithalbhai Patel, to Sushma Swaraj and Arun Jaitley— the Rajya Sabha on Tuesday echoed with quotes from several...
Biraj Adhikari blames the MEA for treating the Chogyal’s 1956 visit as a ‘state visit’ and playing the Sikkim anthem. His book captures his generation’s dilemmas — are Sikkimese truly Indian, especially under Article 371F?
In ‘The Nehru Years’, Swapna Kona Nayudu looks at the history of non-alignment through the Korean War, the Suez Crisis, the Hungarian revolution and the Congo Crisis.
Published by National Book Trust, ‘Jammu Kashmir and Ladakh: Through the Ages’ documents region's history in scientific manner, says Indian Council of Historical Research chairperson.
‘Ab Ki Baar 400 Paar’ may have its genesis in a heated debate between Jawaharlal Nehru and Syama Prasad Mookerjee, when the latter warned Nehru he would crush his 'crushing mentality'.
The Ram Nath Kovind-led panel has listed the benefits of simultaneous elections. Congress and other parties are opposing it without advancing logically tenable reasons.
In 'Modian Consensus', Swadesh Singh talks about how the Nehruvian Consensus demolished the ideas of the Civilisational Consensus that had spiritualism at its core.
The last time this matter flared up was when Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta, in a very similar directive in April, called for the relocation of stray dogs in the capital.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
We are bored of Hindu apologists writing Jinnah bashing partition articles. Nobody’s buying your apologist narrative anymore.
Pakistan was born in the minds of Hindu supremists and if not partition in 1947 , it would have happened in 1997 but it had to happen given the bigotry and the rotten nature of caste Hindu society
Imagine an undivided, Capitalist Republic of India, taking on the world with pride and confidence. Becoming not just an Asian tiger economy but a universal economic powerhouse. Gandhi and Nehru have blood on their hands from partition and also socialism:
We are bored of Hindu apologists writing Jinnah bashing partition articles. Nobody’s buying your apologist narrative anymore.
Pakistan was born in the minds of Hindu supremists and if not partition in 1947 , it would have happened in 1997 but it had to happen given the bigotry and the rotten nature of caste Hindu society
Imagine an undivided, Capitalist Republic of India, taking on the world with pride and confidence. Becoming not just an Asian tiger economy but a universal economic powerhouse. Gandhi and Nehru have blood on their hands from partition and also socialism:
Could Partition have been avoided. I don’t think so. Try to visualise a united India which encompasses Pakistan and Bangladesh.