At entry level, women make up 46% of the workforce in India. At the C-suite level, it’s just 19%. That means for every 10 women who start, fewer than two make it to the top.
Central bank communication now holds as much significance as central bank action. A single clause in a press conference can move markets more than a 25-basis-point adjustment.
Order for 87 MALE drones will be split between 2 Indian firms in 64:36 ratio to ensure there are 2 independent manufacturing lines with at least 60% indigenous components.
The India-South Africa series-defining fact is the catastrophic decline of Indian red ball cricket where a visiting team can mock us with the 'grovel' word.
This is a well-written and well-researched article. The issues raised by the article need to be discussed in a larger audience. There needs to be a legitimate support structure to retain this talent. Women have higher emotional intelligence, which provides wholesome growth for their company and the product. This opportunity is lost when women with talent and experience leave the pipeline.
I suggest the print to send the person who made this inference to a basic statistics class or English class.
If women make up 46 Percent, approximated to 50,
At the top we have 19 percent approximate to 20,
That’s not less than 2 out of 10 women who started.
There is no kind of correlation and inference can not be deducted as those two are two seperate things.
It should have read, only 4 out of 10 eligible women make it to the top.
Not as author mentioned less than 2 out of 10.
Please correct this.
This is a well-written and well-researched article. The issues raised by the article need to be discussed in a larger audience. There needs to be a legitimate support structure to retain this talent. Women have higher emotional intelligence, which provides wholesome growth for their company and the product. This opportunity is lost when women with talent and experience leave the pipeline.
I suggest the print to send the person who made this inference to a basic statistics class or English class.
If women make up 46 Percent, approximated to 50,
At the top we have 19 percent approximate to 20,
That’s not less than 2 out of 10 women who started.
There is no kind of correlation and inference can not be deducted as those two are two seperate things.
It should have read, only 4 out of 10 eligible women make it to the top.
Not as author mentioned less than 2 out of 10.
Please correct this.