Ex-MP complains to defence ministry and PMO about ‘corruption at the highest level’, alleges official used her influence to get the contract for husband.
Discriminatory laws limit firms from hiring willing women, and removing such barriers can help narrow the economic gap between developing and developed countries.
While bond yields tend to fall amid low inflation & interest rate cuts, market experts say they’ve been rising due to concerns over tax collections, fiscal deficit & potential impact of US tariffs.
A panel of experts moderated by ThePrint’s Editor-in-Chief Shekhar Gupta drew connections between insights of 1965 Indo-Pak War and strategic takeaways highlighted by Op Sindoor.
In its toughest time in decades because of floods, Punjab would’ve expected PM Modi to visit. If he has the time for a Bihar tour, why not a short visit to next-door Punjab?
It’s painful to read, a deptmental head denies to safeguard her husband, giving a false affidavit is punishable under law, case should be taken to its logical end and errant officials however highly placed must be tried as per rules and punished if guilt proved
1) Thecontract was offered only to exserice pedicel I. eArmy isinvolvedas pre condition
2) false affidavits are criminal offence. Te veteran acknowledged he knew WA he was doing
3) Any proof that CG mDA spoke to DGR?
4) The ex already had a livelyhood. He denied one to some ex A who needed it.
5) the ex Maj Gen. would be getting a fat pension also in addition to is wife’s salary for ‘roti,kapada aur makan’
A retired Major general is getting hefty pension . In addition he is employed in a top post carrying lakhs as salary again he is employed in private getting a good amount as salary. Then it seems that he is so greedy in amazing wealth. He may be above sixty and all of a sudden with heart failure he dies, can he able to take all this to heaven or hell where he is going. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE SUCH GREEDY. HE SHOULD HAVE ETHICS BEING A RETIRED GENERAL OF THE ARMY. IN FACT A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED FOR HIS WEALTH TO VERIFY WHETHER HE HAS EARNED CORRUPTED MONEY DURING HIS TENURE WITH THE ARMY.
“The contract was reserved for ex-servicemen, with the condition being that the winning bidder should not be employed with any private sector firm, or hold a government job”
There lies the rub. Why was the contract reserved for anyone? Said that, its almost impossible to prove corruption here. All 3 conditions were met by the husband. The real question should be — why make such stupid rules that are prone to corrupt processes?
It’s painful to read, a deptmental head denies to safeguard her husband, giving a false affidavit is punishable under law, case should be taken to its logical end and errant officials however highly placed must be tried as per rules and punished if guilt proved
1) Thecontract was offered only to exserice pedicel I. eArmy isinvolvedas pre condition
2) false affidavits are criminal offence. Te veteran acknowledged he knew WA he was doing
3) Any proof that CG mDA spoke to DGR?
4) The ex already had a livelyhood. He denied one to some ex A who needed it.
5) the ex Maj Gen. would be getting a fat pension also in addition to is wife’s salary for ‘roti,kapada aur makan’
A retired Major general is getting hefty pension . In addition he is employed in a top post carrying lakhs as salary again he is employed in private getting a good amount as salary. Then it seems that he is so greedy in amazing wealth. He may be above sixty and all of a sudden with heart failure he dies, can he able to take all this to heaven or hell where he is going. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE SUCH GREEDY. HE SHOULD HAVE ETHICS BEING A RETIRED GENERAL OF THE ARMY. IN FACT A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED FOR HIS WEALTH TO VERIFY WHETHER HE HAS EARNED CORRUPTED MONEY DURING HIS TENURE WITH THE ARMY.
“The contract was reserved for ex-servicemen, with the condition being that the winning bidder should not be employed with any private sector firm, or hold a government job”
There lies the rub. Why was the contract reserved for anyone? Said that, its almost impossible to prove corruption here. All 3 conditions were met by the husband. The real question should be — why make such stupid rules that are prone to corrupt processes?