Ex-MP complains to defence ministry and PMO about ‘corruption at the highest level’, alleges official used her influence to get the contract for husband.
For an industry globally classified as hazardous, protections such as health insurance and a provident fund for workers are necessities. In Sivakasi, they remain elusive.
The industry forecasts exports are set to grow 16% in 2025-26, boosted by surplus domestic production and a drive to push into 26 underserved global markets with strong potential.
Indigenisation level will progressively increase up to 60 percent with key sub-assemblies, electronics and mechanical parts being manufactured locally.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
It’s painful to read, a deptmental head denies to safeguard her husband, giving a false affidavit is punishable under law, case should be taken to its logical end and errant officials however highly placed must be tried as per rules and punished if guilt proved
1) Thecontract was offered only to exserice pedicel I. eArmy isinvolvedas pre condition
2) false affidavits are criminal offence. Te veteran acknowledged he knew WA he was doing
3) Any proof that CG mDA spoke to DGR?
4) The ex already had a livelyhood. He denied one to some ex A who needed it.
5) the ex Maj Gen. would be getting a fat pension also in addition to is wife’s salary for ‘roti,kapada aur makan’
A retired Major general is getting hefty pension . In addition he is employed in a top post carrying lakhs as salary again he is employed in private getting a good amount as salary. Then it seems that he is so greedy in amazing wealth. He may be above sixty and all of a sudden with heart failure he dies, can he able to take all this to heaven or hell where he is going. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE SUCH GREEDY. HE SHOULD HAVE ETHICS BEING A RETIRED GENERAL OF THE ARMY. IN FACT A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED FOR HIS WEALTH TO VERIFY WHETHER HE HAS EARNED CORRUPTED MONEY DURING HIS TENURE WITH THE ARMY.
“The contract was reserved for ex-servicemen, with the condition being that the winning bidder should not be employed with any private sector firm, or hold a government job”
There lies the rub. Why was the contract reserved for anyone? Said that, its almost impossible to prove corruption here. All 3 conditions were met by the husband. The real question should be — why make such stupid rules that are prone to corrupt processes?
It’s painful to read, a deptmental head denies to safeguard her husband, giving a false affidavit is punishable under law, case should be taken to its logical end and errant officials however highly placed must be tried as per rules and punished if guilt proved
1) Thecontract was offered only to exserice pedicel I. eArmy isinvolvedas pre condition
2) false affidavits are criminal offence. Te veteran acknowledged he knew WA he was doing
3) Any proof that CG mDA spoke to DGR?
4) The ex already had a livelyhood. He denied one to some ex A who needed it.
5) the ex Maj Gen. would be getting a fat pension also in addition to is wife’s salary for ‘roti,kapada aur makan’
A retired Major general is getting hefty pension . In addition he is employed in a top post carrying lakhs as salary again he is employed in private getting a good amount as salary. Then it seems that he is so greedy in amazing wealth. He may be above sixty and all of a sudden with heart failure he dies, can he able to take all this to heaven or hell where he is going. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE SUCH GREEDY. HE SHOULD HAVE ETHICS BEING A RETIRED GENERAL OF THE ARMY. IN FACT A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED FOR HIS WEALTH TO VERIFY WHETHER HE HAS EARNED CORRUPTED MONEY DURING HIS TENURE WITH THE ARMY.
“The contract was reserved for ex-servicemen, with the condition being that the winning bidder should not be employed with any private sector firm, or hold a government job”
There lies the rub. Why was the contract reserved for anyone? Said that, its almost impossible to prove corruption here. All 3 conditions were met by the husband. The real question should be — why make such stupid rules that are prone to corrupt processes?