In blog, BJP veteran L.K. Advani writes that party has been at forefront of protecting the integrity of democratic institutions, cites its role during Emergency.
The IndiGo crisis is nothing short of a threat to India’s stability. Could it be an experiment? Can this happen in any other crucial sector like power or railways?
RBI Handbook of Statistics shows state’s GSDP has more than doubled in past decade, finishing second behind Maharashtra. It has performed well across health & education parameters as well.
It is argued that India-Israel ties are moving from buyer–seller dynamic to one focused on joint development & manufacturing partnership, a shift 'more durable' than traditional arms sales.
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
What an exaggerated sense of self importance Indian politicians have of themselves and what a spectacle the media makes out of their passing away is evident from the coverage of the recent deaths in the BJP. Sad but true.
Most of them have spent a lifetime doing dirty deals, settling personal scores, fighting elections on ill gotten money and enriching themselves, with very little time and effort expended on working for the common good.
Arun Jaitley was a sauve, articulate, intelligent, smooth talking politician, but he was no statesman.
A nice tribute to a former colleague indeed. Some non BJP government have been attempting to pursuade Ganesh Utsav Samithis to maintain uniform size of Ganesh Idols to reduce pollution of lakes and water bodies. They have failed because it has backing of BJP. When it comes to Gujarat Ahemadabad Municipal Corporation has refused to provide cranes for immersion of Ganesh idols in Sabramathi River. Any such attempt in non BJP ruled state it face hostile reaction from BJP and other Sangh outfits. When we Hindus don’t for think in common interest, of what use would be UCC. Laws cannot be imposed as tribute to a particular leader or party. I do have immense respect for Arunji as I was a admirer of him during college days and have joined in agitation led by him. It does not mean we should blindly support something which we don’t follow in our daily life.
UNIFORM CIVIL CODE WILL PROVE REGRESSIVE, IF IT IS DONE WITH THE INTENTION OF TARGETING A SPECIFIC COMMUNITY. UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IS POSSIBLE ONLY IF THE STATE DOLLOWS STRICT SECULARISM MAKING RELIGION STRICTLY PERSONAL THING NO MINORITY APPEASEMENT NO MAJORITY APPEASEMENT NO KRISHNASHTAMI IN POLICE STATION NO RSS MARCH ON STREETS NO HAZ SABSIDI
Uniform Civil code by a political party which it self believes in religious fundamentalism and communal supremacy itself should be termed as regressive on minorities.
What an exaggerated sense of self importance Indian politicians have of themselves and what a spectacle the media makes out of their passing away is evident from the coverage of the recent deaths in the BJP. Sad but true.
Most of them have spent a lifetime doing dirty deals, settling personal scores, fighting elections on ill gotten money and enriching themselves, with very little time and effort expended on working for the common good.
Arun Jaitley was a sauve, articulate, intelligent, smooth talking politician, but he was no statesman.
A nice tribute to a former colleague indeed. Some non BJP government have been attempting to pursuade Ganesh Utsav Samithis to maintain uniform size of Ganesh Idols to reduce pollution of lakes and water bodies. They have failed because it has backing of BJP. When it comes to Gujarat Ahemadabad Municipal Corporation has refused to provide cranes for immersion of Ganesh idols in Sabramathi River. Any such attempt in non BJP ruled state it face hostile reaction from BJP and other Sangh outfits. When we Hindus don’t for think in common interest, of what use would be UCC. Laws cannot be imposed as tribute to a particular leader or party. I do have immense respect for Arunji as I was a admirer of him during college days and have joined in agitation led by him. It does not mean we should blindly support something which we don’t follow in our daily life.
UNIFORM CIVIL CODE WILL PROVE REGRESSIVE, IF IT IS DONE WITH THE INTENTION OF TARGETING A SPECIFIC COMMUNITY. UNIFORM CIVIL CODE IS POSSIBLE ONLY IF THE STATE DOLLOWS STRICT SECULARISM MAKING RELIGION STRICTLY PERSONAL THING NO MINORITY APPEASEMENT NO MAJORITY APPEASEMENT NO KRISHNASHTAMI IN POLICE STATION NO RSS MARCH ON STREETS NO HAZ SABSIDI
Uniform Civil code by a political party which it self believes in religious fundamentalism and communal supremacy itself should be termed as regressive on minorities.