The SC delivered a judgment on the need to give a reason to file RTI on high courts. That has not only harmed the Act but the basic principle of legal reasoning.
Many ascribe Ranjan Gogoi’s nomination as a reward from Modi government for services rendered as CJI. By accepting it, Gogoi only strengthens their case.
Wouldn’t it be better if SC focussed its energy on tackling the root causes – the inordinate delays and miscarriage of justice in India's legal system?
Report by think-tank Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy also calls for debate on whether India wants young candidates to get appointed to this ‘crucial office’.
From calling for chemical castration of rapists to calling out an HC judge for 'targeting' her to 'overzealous trials', judge Kamini Lau has done it all.
Speaking at the inauguration of the Rajasthan High Court building in Jodhpur, he said the ‘length of time taken for conclusion of litigation is a big deterrent’.
If we get this right, the citizen of 2047 will experience government as ambient and humane. Benefits arrive when needed without forms; grievances resolve in hours.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
In post on social media, Cooper narrated experience of MiG-21 researcher from Germany who wanted to attend aircraft’s farewell ceremony in India, and the roadblocks he faced.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
If you think that decision of Supreme Court is final then you are not aware of law in force. Review is alternative. In execution it can be changed is second alternative. I am in touch of a civil case become final in Supreme Court in year 2010 was changed by High Court in year 2018 in execution second appeal. This changed decision was upheld by the Supreme Court in year 2018 review was dismissed. This decision was not considered as final by execution Court. The case is in appeal in High Court. Please let me know if you need any further information.
The real issue is that flawed legal reasoning at the level of the Hon’ble Apex Court corrodes the Law of the Land irreparably unless the Hon’ble Apex Court itself corrects the situation for there is no other remedy.
Yes, this judgement is a cause of concern. But the SC did not shut all the doors. This judgement leaves it to the discretion of one officer to get information, which certainly is not fair.
The Law of the land should protect the rights. This judgement hampers very fundamental right-Right to Live and this should not be a valid reference to others to reject information.
In the Preamble of the constitution the word used like “we the people of India”. If consider India is people’s government then provide right to get all the information to the people under Right to Information Act,2005 if violate through amendments automatically violates a parent act.
RTI came to be enacted on the basis of various Supreme Court judgements. Unfortunately now orthodox views of Supreme Court and high court’s judges are main hurdles in implementation of law. I come across judgement where Supreme Court upheld order refusing in providing information of salary of the husband to the wife required in maintenance proceeding. Height of foolishness.
The RTI Act 2005 is very significant especially for the common people of India facing communal conspiracy, problem of corruption, digging illigalities of the high powered persons indulged in depriving the right of common people of India.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court may review this judgment. RTI Act should not be amended.
RTI is the most abused legislation.Any body can obtain any information, except the barred ones,for undisclosed purpose and do whatever he feels like.Both the HC Rules and the SC ruling are absolutely right and in public interest.
There is one abiding reason the RTI Act understands : The people’s right to know what their government is doing. Who asks the question, and why, is irrelevant.
If the High Court rules prescribes a mandatory clause of reason supported with the affidavit for seeking the certified copies of document in the pending cases then it is a correct rule because the authenticity of document is still a matter of adjudication ,however similar requisite in the disposed case is not followed in other high courts.
Supreme court is trying hard to reach new low in law. Already smeared with egg ontis face foolishly trying to pretend divinity but sounds hills.
Lot of nonsense and blackmailing goes under the guise of RTI act
.so the judgement asking for reasoning of application is very important.
Let it prevail
If the High Court rules prescribes a mandatory clause of reason supported with the affidavit for seeking the certified copies of document in the pending cases then it is a correct rule because the authenticity of document is still a matter of adjudication ,however similar requisite in the disposed case is not followed in other high courts.
RTIs r filed to know what govt. Is doing where is black mailing there?
It means wrong doing should be continued like modi govt. is doing since 2014.
If any one is blackmailing, this must be reported to police. The fact is that only corrupt officials are afraid of RTI.
If you think that decision of Supreme Court is final then you are not aware of law in force. Review is alternative. In execution it can be changed is second alternative. I am in touch of a civil case become final in Supreme Court in year 2010 was changed by High Court in year 2018 in execution second appeal. This changed decision was upheld by the Supreme Court in year 2018 review was dismissed. This decision was not considered as final by execution Court. The case is in appeal in High Court. Please let me know if you need any further information.
The real issue is that flawed legal reasoning at the level of the Hon’ble Apex Court corrodes the Law of the Land irreparably unless the Hon’ble Apex Court itself corrects the situation for there is no other remedy.
Yes, this judgement is a cause of concern. But the SC did not shut all the doors. This judgement leaves it to the discretion of one officer to get information, which certainly is not fair.
The Law of the land should protect the rights. This judgement hampers very fundamental right-Right to Live and this should not be a valid reference to others to reject information.
In the Preamble of the constitution the word used like “we the people of India”. If consider India is people’s government then provide right to get all the information to the people under Right to Information Act,2005 if violate through amendments automatically violates a parent act.
RTI came to be enacted on the basis of various Supreme Court judgements. Unfortunately now orthodox views of Supreme Court and high court’s judges are main hurdles in implementation of law. I come across judgement where Supreme Court upheld order refusing in providing information of salary of the husband to the wife required in maintenance proceeding. Height of foolishness.
The RTI Act 2005 is very significant especially for the common people of India facing communal conspiracy, problem of corruption, digging illigalities of the high powered persons indulged in depriving the right of common people of India.
The Hon’ble Supreme Court may review this judgment. RTI Act should not be amended.
RTI is the most abused legislation.Any body can obtain any information, except the barred ones,for undisclosed purpose and do whatever he feels like.Both the HC Rules and the SC ruling are absolutely right and in public interest.
Hello,
Could you provide me the citation of the Case please,
I would love to read it myself, if you could assist, before making any comment.
Thanks and Regards
Ajay Singhal
There is one abiding reason the RTI Act understands : The people’s right to know what their government is doing. Who asks the question, and why, is irrelevant.
If the High Court rules prescribes a mandatory clause of reason supported with the affidavit for seeking the certified copies of document in the pending cases then it is a correct rule because the authenticity of document is still a matter of adjudication ,however similar requisite in the disposed case is not followed in other high courts.
Supreme court is trying hard to reach new low in law. Already smeared with egg ontis face foolishly trying to pretend divinity but sounds hills.
Lot of nonsense and blackmailing goes under the guise of RTI act
.so the judgement asking for reasoning of application is very important.
Let it prevail
If the High Court rules prescribes a mandatory clause of reason supported with the affidavit for seeking the certified copies of document in the pending cases then it is a correct rule because the authenticity of document is still a matter of adjudication ,however similar requisite in the disposed case is not followed in other high courts.
RTIs r filed to know what govt. Is doing where is black mailing there?
It means wrong doing should be continued like modi govt. is doing since 2014.
If any one is blackmailing, this must be reported to police. The fact is that only corrupt officials are afraid of RTI.