Approach taken by India’s courts & tribunals should be questioned, but it is also necessary to acknowledge that courts act in response to state failures.
The manifesto’s silence on legal reforms in the digital space is concerning. The outdated Information Technology Act, about two decades old now, remains India’s nodal tech law.
Economists say there are weaknesses in India’s GDP data. But statisticians claim the accusations are based on flawed understanding, saying while GDP has problems, the economists are looking in the wrong places.
Coaching centres for Army aspirants in Jhunjhunu are shutting down due to plummeting admissions in the face of a lack of job guarantees under Agnipath Scheme.
It’s a fashion for librandus to seed conflicts between the judiciary and the government. In healthy democracy judiciary and the government are required to support each other in the national interest otherwise both would become the playground of anti nationals that India has in abundance.
You want to avoid a visit from the ED by being prudent, eh ;)?
Indian judiciary has no back bone. It has no spine (connected to the brain) either, as it gives judgements which defy principles of justice and do not uphold the rule of law. They do not protect individual rights. So very little can be hoped for from the new worthy also. ?
CJI Gogoi was not just a disappointment, he seemed to lack a spine in the interest of justice. The new CJI will most probably be the same based on history of not writing judgements in most of his cases.
I think this will complete the circle of India’s democratic institutions all failing at the same time.
It’s a fashion for librandus to seed conflicts between the judiciary and the government. In healthy democracy judiciary and the government are required to support each other in the national interest otherwise both would become the playground of anti nationals that India has in abundance.
The initials of the first anti -national are ak.d.
Only a thrice filtered idiot can hold your point of view.
A lot of reconstructive surgery is required. Prudence deters one from dilating further.
You want to avoid a visit from the ED by being prudent, eh ;)?
Indian judiciary has no back bone. It has no spine (connected to the brain) either, as it gives judgements which defy principles of justice and do not uphold the rule of law. They do not protect individual rights. So very little can be hoped for from the new worthy also. ?
Agreed. 100%.
CJI Gogoi was not just a disappointment, he seemed to lack a spine in the interest of justice. The new CJI will most probably be the same based on history of not writing judgements in most of his cases.
I think this will complete the circle of India’s democratic institutions all failing at the same time.
You think you are the only intelligent. Lol
No Rajvirji. As long as people like you are there, others are just simple idiots by comparison. LOL, and very loud.