The Indian Statistical Insititute advises EC that for representative sample, 50% verification not needed. Poll panel to frame response to SC based on input.
For an industry globally classified as hazardous, protections such as health insurance and a provident fund for workers are necessities. In Sivakasi, they remain elusive.
The industry forecasts exports are set to grow 16% in 2025-26, boosted by surplus domestic production and a drive to push into 26 underserved global markets with strong potential.
Indigenisation level will progressively increase up to 60 percent with key sub-assemblies, electronics and mechanical parts being manufactured locally.
It is a brilliant, reasonably priced, and mostly homemade aircraft with a stellar safety record; only two crashes in 24 years since its first flight. But its crash is a moment of introspection.
India has no shortage of cybercriminals whom the GOI has conveniently left alone with the exception of limited action when there is an uproar in the US or Britain. The “Shadow Brokers” ransomware attacks and hackings were traced to India (the name shadow broker translates to a woman’s name Chhaya Dalal, whatever the reason why criminals chose that name) as are nearly daily phone frauds run by what India conveniently calls “fake call centers.” Is RAW aware of which unemployed programmer (s) in India would be open to being hired by Chinese or other foreign intelligence to steal Indian secrets from within? It would be far easier for the Chinese to hire Indians and make them do their dirty work for example, while also using apps, China assembled phones and computers, and Chinese modems, exchanges and other telecom equipment to spy on India. You might be surprised at how much easier this would be compared to using AI or other technology instead. I understand that the prevailing mood in India is that phone criminals and cyberfrauds ought to be dealt with mildly because they are “our boys” who are only cheating the hated goras and NRIs. That would change very fast when these crooks take on Indians and on government agencies for external enemies. Trusting a criminal to not harm you because you let him / her thieve from foreigners is the same level of stupidity as Churchill’s proverbial point about feeding a crocodile in the hope that it would eat you last. If India does not deal with the enemies that live inside the country, it will have n one else to blame when cataclysm hits it from within as well.
India has no shortage of cybercriminals whom the GOI has conveniently left alone with the exception of limited action when there is an uproar in the US or Britain. The “Shadow Brokers” ransomware attacks and hackings were traced to India (the name shadow broker translates to a woman’s name Chhaya Dalal, whatever the reason why criminals chose that name) as are nearly daily phone frauds run by what India conveniently calls “fake call centers.” Is RAW aware of which unemployed programmer (s) in India would be open to being hired by Chinese or other foreign intelligence to steal Indian secrets from within? It would be far easier for the Chinese to hire Indians and make them do their dirty work for example, while also using apps, China assembled phones and computers, and Chinese modems, exchanges and other telecom equipment to spy on India. You might be surprised at how much easier this would be compared to using AI or other technology instead. I understand that the prevailing mood in India is that phone criminals and cyberfrauds ought to be dealt with mildly because they are “our boys” who are only cheating the hated goras and NRIs. That would change very fast when these crooks take on Indians and on government agencies for external enemies. Trusting a criminal to not harm you because you let him / her thieve from foreigners is the same level of stupidity as Churchill’s proverbial point about feeding a crocodile in the hope that it would eat you last. If India does not deal with the enemies that live inside the country, it will have n one else to blame when cataclysm hits it from within as well.
Elon Musk Left openAI around 7 months back and hasn’t been part of OpenAi for more than 1 and half year. So it is not Elon Musk’s OpenAI