Indian political leaders will have to prepare their public for the prospect of concessions India never really held—just as Chinese leaders must admit Arunachal Pradesh and Ladakh were never theirs.
All of a sudden, the great game of diplomacy has taken a modified path for India. The burden to put the pressure back on Washington has fallen on New Delhi.
Against backdrop of Nepal registering protest over India-China trade announcement, ThePrint explains significance of Lipulekh Pass through prism of 1816 treaty, 1991 memorandum & 2019 map.
Speaking at event organised by think tank, China’s envoy in India also defended Belt and Road Initiative and said all countries ‘are welcome’ to participate in the $1tn infra project.
Speaking at summit organised by Chintan Research Foundation, Chinese Ambassador to India Xu Feihong said an Asian century can only succeed with a developed India and China.
New Delhi: Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi Tuesday pushed for a “dual-track” progress for ties with India, separating economic ties from the boundary question,...
The Chinese foreign minister, currently in India, said that setbacks in New Delhi-Beijing ties over past few years 'were not in interest of people of our two countries'.
Comments from govt sources come after Chinese readout of the meeting mentions the Indian external affairs minister agreed that Taiwan is a part of China.
Fifteen operators across 9 countries have inquired about India's technology, and nations like Kenya, Mauritius, Papua New Guinea, and Egypt have shown concrete interest in Indian 4G and 5G stacks.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
Since 1815, Nepali Gorkhas have served in Indian & British Armies, as well as in Bihar, Bengal & Assam Police. Since Agnipath scheme came in, no Nepal-domiciled Gorkha has enlisted.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
The contents of this article prove Nehru was not an idealist nor a romantic as he has been made out to be just to malign him.
He was a hard core realist. There are reports that Nehru sought US and UK help, they asked him to do anything short of military action – source Ranjit Kahla.
And the readers ought to know Tibet was an autonomous part of China but started acting as an independent entity following chaos after the disintegration of the Qing Dynasty and taking advantage of this Britain, in 1914 brought Tibet under India and did nothing to develop it. Aksai Chin also was brought arbitrarily/unilaterally under India in 1911.
Tibet’s autonomous status within China is confirmed by Prof. Srinath Raghavan and in lengthy details by Melvyn C Goldstein giving evidence from the US archives that even after the communist takeover US recognized Tibet as an autonomous part of China and maintained same position while supplying arms to the Tibetan rebels during the 1959 revolt.
General Cariappa had also made it clear besides allotting limited soldiers India did not possess capability to take on China militarily. Nehru acted out of realism and according to John W Garver, Nehru worked hard to ensure Tibet had maximum autonomy so could prevent heavy presence of Chinese soldiers on the border with India.
China while promising autonomy to Tibet turned around, they did many somersaults with Nehru as well. Read “War and Peace in Modern India” by Prof. Srinath Raghavan, a well researched book and nothing shot from his hip which most of the Indians do.
The Guiding Principles of 2005 were a good moment for the relationship. “ No disturbance of settled populations. “ Needs to be taken forward. Also, final settlement of the boundary question need not hold up progress on other issues, led by more trade and investment.
The contents of this article prove Nehru was not an idealist nor a romantic as he has been made out to be just to malign him.
He was a hard core realist. There are reports that Nehru sought US and UK help, they asked him to do anything short of military action – source Ranjit Kahla.
And the readers ought to know Tibet was an autonomous part of China but started acting as an independent entity following chaos after the disintegration of the Qing Dynasty and taking advantage of this Britain, in 1914 brought Tibet under India and did nothing to develop it. Aksai Chin also was brought arbitrarily/unilaterally under India in 1911.
Tibet’s autonomous status within China is confirmed by Prof. Srinath Raghavan and in lengthy details by Melvyn C Goldstein giving evidence from the US archives that even after the communist takeover US recognized Tibet as an autonomous part of China and maintained same position while supplying arms to the Tibetan rebels during the 1959 revolt.
General Cariappa had also made it clear besides allotting limited soldiers India did not possess capability to take on China militarily. Nehru acted out of realism and according to John W Garver, Nehru worked hard to ensure Tibet had maximum autonomy so could prevent heavy presence of Chinese soldiers on the border with India.
China while promising autonomy to Tibet turned around, they did many somersaults with Nehru as well. Read “War and Peace in Modern India” by Prof. Srinath Raghavan, a well researched book and nothing shot from his hip which most of the Indians do.
The Guiding Principles of 2005 were a good moment for the relationship. “ No disturbance of settled populations. “ Needs to be taken forward. Also, final settlement of the boundary question need not hold up progress on other issues, led by more trade and investment.