Advocates are demanding the withdrawal of a central notification creating a Haryana Administrative Tribunal in Karnal, which they say is unconstitutional.
Munir indicates that he’s willing to go for broke, even if it risks taking his country “and half the world” down with him. It’s important to understand where he is coming from.
India’s industrial output growth saw a 10-month low in June, with Index of Industrial Production (IIP) growing by mere 1.5% as against 1.9% in May 2025.
Gen Dwivedi framed Op Sindoor not just as retaliation to Pahalgam, but as demonstration of India’s capability to fight multi-domain conflicts with integration between services & agencies.
Standing up to America is usually not a personal risk for a leader in India. Any suggestions of foreign pressure unites India behind who they see as leading them in that fight.
Aur dalo vote modi ko,even judiciary is not save under modi regime, the person appointed by state ,,,can how delivered justice to common man,he will favour to government only
Advocates appearing or not are the same for litigants. And doesnt make much difference. Advocates have no sincerity in conducting litigants cause.but for them fees only matters
Testing times indeed for the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association and lawyers practising in this High Court enveloping almost
three states.
I wonder at the decision of the central government issuing a central notification to set up a Haryana Administrative Tribunal at Karnal.
How fine it would have been, had the central government offered Haryana an independent High Court of its own.No denying the fact that
in the” so-called public mandate ” central regime decisions are guided by political vested interests and whims of those at the helm of affairs .
The Bar Association did make a mention of independence of judiciary and constitution but to my mind all such things are quite ridiculous
and irrelevant in the present day scheme of things. It can be safely fancied that these two were the values honoured in the twentieth century
that too not in toto but up to a large extent.
Now we are in the twenty first century and rightly so dreaming of NEW INDIA !
It distresses me that the Bar Association is agitating where the vested interests of the lawyers community are being pricked .That is why
it is taking refuge and shelter in the name of long cherished values as well as the sanctity of independence of judiciary and constitution.
Why should not it raise its voice when these are thrown to winds with impunity elsewhere too pertaining to various others disciplines
of life.?
The Bar Association will see eye to eye with this assertion that independence of judiciary and constitution matter and signify in the same fashion in other streams of life too. It should not have a lop-sided view of the two institutions of the state employing these selectively to
meet its own ends.
You are right. Other tribunals are there like tax tribunal, industrial tribunal and armed forces tribunal which also deal with employment. Why haryana employees of govt are so special they cannot go to tribunal but only high court in the first instance?
The bar association is extraordinarily stubborn and unreasonable so the strike will just go on and on and govt will not do anything.
Let the tribunal be in chandigarh then maybe that is what they really want and then they may stop striking.
Aur dalo vote modi ko,even judiciary is not save under modi regime, the person appointed by state ,,,can how delivered justice to common man,he will favour to government only
Advocates appearing or not are the same for litigants. And doesnt make much difference. Advocates have no sincerity in conducting litigants cause.but for them fees only matters
Prof PK Sharma, Freelance Journalist,Barnala (Punjab)
Testing times indeed for the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association and lawyers practising in this High Court enveloping almost
three states.
I wonder at the decision of the central government issuing a central notification to set up a Haryana Administrative Tribunal at Karnal.
How fine it would have been, had the central government offered Haryana an independent High Court of its own.No denying the fact that
in the” so-called public mandate ” central regime decisions are guided by political vested interests and whims of those at the helm of affairs .
The Bar Association did make a mention of independence of judiciary and constitution but to my mind all such things are quite ridiculous
and irrelevant in the present day scheme of things. It can be safely fancied that these two were the values honoured in the twentieth century
that too not in toto but up to a large extent.
Now we are in the twenty first century and rightly so dreaming of NEW INDIA !
It distresses me that the Bar Association is agitating where the vested interests of the lawyers community are being pricked .That is why
it is taking refuge and shelter in the name of long cherished values as well as the sanctity of independence of judiciary and constitution.
Why should not it raise its voice when these are thrown to winds with impunity elsewhere too pertaining to various others disciplines
of life.?
The Bar Association will see eye to eye with this assertion that independence of judiciary and constitution matter and signify in the same fashion in other streams of life too. It should not have a lop-sided view of the two institutions of the state employing these selectively to
meet its own ends.
Prof PK Sharma, Freelance Journalist
Pom Anm Nest,Barnala (Punjab)
You are right. Other tribunals are there like tax tribunal, industrial tribunal and armed forces tribunal which also deal with employment. Why haryana employees of govt are so special they cannot go to tribunal but only high court in the first instance?
The bar association is extraordinarily stubborn and unreasonable so the strike will just go on and on and govt will not do anything.
Let the tribunal be in chandigarh then maybe that is what they really want and then they may stop striking.