Advocates are demanding the withdrawal of a central notification creating a Haryana Administrative Tribunal in Karnal, which they say is unconstitutional.
In May 1974, RSS chief Madhukar Dattatraya Deoras spoke at a lecture series in Pune about caste-based discrimination and social equality within the Hindu fold.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
While the IAF remains committed to the Tejas programme and has placed orders for 180 Tejas Mk1A, the force is eagerly waiting for the Tejas Mk 2 version.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
Aur dalo vote modi ko,even judiciary is not save under modi regime, the person appointed by state ,,,can how delivered justice to common man,he will favour to government only
Advocates appearing or not are the same for litigants. And doesnt make much difference. Advocates have no sincerity in conducting litigants cause.but for them fees only matters
Testing times indeed for the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association and lawyers practising in this High Court enveloping almost
three states.
I wonder at the decision of the central government issuing a central notification to set up a Haryana Administrative Tribunal at Karnal.
How fine it would have been, had the central government offered Haryana an independent High Court of its own.No denying the fact that
in the” so-called public mandate ” central regime decisions are guided by political vested interests and whims of those at the helm of affairs .
The Bar Association did make a mention of independence of judiciary and constitution but to my mind all such things are quite ridiculous
and irrelevant in the present day scheme of things. It can be safely fancied that these two were the values honoured in the twentieth century
that too not in toto but up to a large extent.
Now we are in the twenty first century and rightly so dreaming of NEW INDIA !
It distresses me that the Bar Association is agitating where the vested interests of the lawyers community are being pricked .That is why
it is taking refuge and shelter in the name of long cherished values as well as the sanctity of independence of judiciary and constitution.
Why should not it raise its voice when these are thrown to winds with impunity elsewhere too pertaining to various others disciplines
of life.?
The Bar Association will see eye to eye with this assertion that independence of judiciary and constitution matter and signify in the same fashion in other streams of life too. It should not have a lop-sided view of the two institutions of the state employing these selectively to
meet its own ends.
You are right. Other tribunals are there like tax tribunal, industrial tribunal and armed forces tribunal which also deal with employment. Why haryana employees of govt are so special they cannot go to tribunal but only high court in the first instance?
The bar association is extraordinarily stubborn and unreasonable so the strike will just go on and on and govt will not do anything.
Let the tribunal be in chandigarh then maybe that is what they really want and then they may stop striking.
Aur dalo vote modi ko,even judiciary is not save under modi regime, the person appointed by state ,,,can how delivered justice to common man,he will favour to government only
Advocates appearing or not are the same for litigants. And doesnt make much difference. Advocates have no sincerity in conducting litigants cause.but for them fees only matters
Prof PK Sharma, Freelance Journalist,Barnala (Punjab)
Testing times indeed for the Punjab and Haryana High Court Bar Association and lawyers practising in this High Court enveloping almost
three states.
I wonder at the decision of the central government issuing a central notification to set up a Haryana Administrative Tribunal at Karnal.
How fine it would have been, had the central government offered Haryana an independent High Court of its own.No denying the fact that
in the” so-called public mandate ” central regime decisions are guided by political vested interests and whims of those at the helm of affairs .
The Bar Association did make a mention of independence of judiciary and constitution but to my mind all such things are quite ridiculous
and irrelevant in the present day scheme of things. It can be safely fancied that these two were the values honoured in the twentieth century
that too not in toto but up to a large extent.
Now we are in the twenty first century and rightly so dreaming of NEW INDIA !
It distresses me that the Bar Association is agitating where the vested interests of the lawyers community are being pricked .That is why
it is taking refuge and shelter in the name of long cherished values as well as the sanctity of independence of judiciary and constitution.
Why should not it raise its voice when these are thrown to winds with impunity elsewhere too pertaining to various others disciplines
of life.?
The Bar Association will see eye to eye with this assertion that independence of judiciary and constitution matter and signify in the same fashion in other streams of life too. It should not have a lop-sided view of the two institutions of the state employing these selectively to
meet its own ends.
Prof PK Sharma, Freelance Journalist
Pom Anm Nest,Barnala (Punjab)
You are right. Other tribunals are there like tax tribunal, industrial tribunal and armed forces tribunal which also deal with employment. Why haryana employees of govt are so special they cannot go to tribunal but only high court in the first instance?
The bar association is extraordinarily stubborn and unreasonable so the strike will just go on and on and govt will not do anything.
Let the tribunal be in chandigarh then maybe that is what they really want and then they may stop striking.