There is an infrastructure shortage in Eastern Ladakh, stemming from the fact that such large-scale movement of troops was unheard of in the region, and due to the challenging terrain.
Zhang Guozhu communicated the decisions of the Central Military Commission to the frontline troops and hence, was well aware of China’s reasons for the war.
Satellite imagery experts say that Chinese presence in Ladakh has grown since May with the deployment of additional equipment and defensive structures.
Former 14 Corps Commander Lt. Gen. P.J.S. Pannu tells ThePrint China's LAC action came after joint exercise with India, like Pakistan attacked Kargil despite confidence-building measures.
Finance ministry says the proposed revamp will focus on structural reforms, rate rationalisation & ease of living, & will be deliberated upon in the coming weeks.
The project is meant to be a ‘protective shield that will keep expanding’, the PM said. It is on the lines of the ‘Golden Dome’ announced by Trump, it is learnt.
Now that both IAF and PAF have made formal claims of having shot down the other’s aircraft in the 87-hour war in May, we can ask a larger question: do such numbers really matter?
This is classic The Print speaking in China’s voice; making it appear to the reader that India was responsible for what happened.
Why don’t you write about what New Delhi told Beijing?
The chowkidar said nothing happened, so how can the Print contradict that ? They can only report what China said. Modi, Shah and Bhagwat are quiet as mice.
This is classic The Print speaking in China’s voice; making it appear to the reader that India was responsible for what happened.
Why don’t you write about what New Delhi told Beijing?
The chowkidar said nothing happened, so how can the Print contradict that ? They can only report what China said. Modi, Shah and Bhagwat are quiet as mice.