As social media debated whether audiences were consuming Pujarini Pradhan as a symbol, The Juggernaut turned her into a story that could circulate globally, with or without her participation.
Published by Penguin, Pixels to Profits by Ankur Mehra will be released on 3 April on SoftCover, ThePrint’s online platform for launching non-fiction books.
OTT platforms, social media sites & internet service providers are now under the bill's purview too. 'Censorship clause' and the Centre's discretionary powers raise concerns.
Panda was giving keynote address on Digital Personal Data Protection Act at Global Technology Summit, organised by External Affairs Ministry & Delhi-based think-tank Carnegie India.
ChuChu TV’s generalised content doesn’t cater solely to Indians. It has a network of 12 channels, with languages ranging from English to Tamil to French.
Text summarization is creating a shortened version of a larger text. The goal is to capture the most important information from the original text and omitting unnecessary details.
The store at Delhi’s Pusa road is the first of its kind “experiential store” for the online education portal which plans to launch 3 other physical stores in Jaipur, Kota & Lucknow.
Industry says manufacturers have 2-4 weeks of buffer stocks, but prolonged disruption could push up shortage risks, especially of consumables like IV and syringes.
French newspaper La Tribune earlier last week indicated that UAE withdrew from deal to fund EUR 3.5 billion. India is looking to order 114 new Rafales, which could include the F5.
China patiently invested capital, skill and technology in coal gasification. Unlike it, we won’t move from words to action. As crude prices decline, we lose interest.
The internet has turned making “deep” points into a full-blown industry. It’s reached a point where journalists and commentators basically treat every local influencer drama as raw material to show off how smart they are. They just plug in whatever buzzwords are trendin….class, politics, whatever, and use it to “flex and justify” their intellectual credibility.
The actual incident doesn’t even matter; it’s just a convenient hook for arguments they already wanted to make. This “forced aura” in this article is pretty easily seen. People aren’t really talking about Pujarini; they’re using her as a prop to talk about themselves and their own ideas because she checks the right boxes.
It’s a weird cycle: the more trivial the original post is, the harder these “experts” have to work to make it sound significant. Eventually, you have a village girl’s Instagram carrying the weight of the country’s entire social history.
We’ve lost all common sense. Most influencer beef is just petty and unremarkable. Not every minor squabble is some massive sociological event. The gap between what actually happened and the over-analysis piled on top of it is huge—it tells you everything about the people writing the commentary and almost nothing about reality.
The internet has turned making “deep” points into a full-blown industry. It’s reached a point where journalists and commentators basically treat every local influencer drama as raw material to show off how smart they are. They just plug in whatever buzzwords are trendin….class, politics, whatever, and use it to “flex and justify” their intellectual credibility.
The actual incident doesn’t even matter; it’s just a convenient hook for arguments they already wanted to make. This “forced aura” in this article is pretty easily seen. People aren’t really talking about Pujarini; they’re using her as a prop to talk about themselves and their own ideas because she checks the right boxes.
It’s a weird cycle: the more trivial the original post is, the harder these “experts” have to work to make it sound significant. Eventually, you have a village girl’s Instagram carrying the weight of the country’s entire social history.
We’ve lost all common sense. Most influencer beef is just petty and unremarkable. Not every minor squabble is some massive sociological event. The gap between what actually happened and the over-analysis piled on top of it is huge—it tells you everything about the people writing the commentary and almost nothing about reality.