By enforcing colonial-era laws & using technology for illiberal causes, India and Pakistan are no different from the British when it comes to quashing dissent.
The claim that VB-GRAMG provides an employment guarantee is incorrect. The only guarantee is to 'empower' the Centre to allow partial implementation in notified areas alone.
It is argued that India-Israel ties are moving from buyer–seller dynamic to one focused on joint development & manufacturing partnership, a shift 'more durable' than traditional arms sales.
Don’t blame misfortune. This is colossal incompetence and insensitivity. So bad, heads would have rolled even in the old PSU-era Indian Airlines and Air India.
Actually, the English respected the rule of law. Except for the clearly defined object of preserving their colonial rule, the courts of law delivered justice. Consider the quality of construction of government buildings, dams, bridges, the rail network. Doodh mein bilkul paani nahin tha.
It is always interesting to read P. MISHRA. The title attracted me. but we come out of this article. Of course we agree with the observations developed by Mishra. But we waited for a deeper reflection on the Enlightenment philosophy in this part of Asia. Mishra’s remarks are limited to freedom of the press. This refexion is important, but it is fragmentary. Indeed, we have the impression that with the attractiveness of the Chinese model of development as well as the rise of illiberalism that we are witnessing the emergence of an alternative solution to the democracies born of the philosophy of enlightenment . The title of the article suggested a reflection, MISHRA on this phenomenon. But this is not the case
Actually, the English respected the rule of law. Except for the clearly defined object of preserving their colonial rule, the courts of law delivered justice. Consider the quality of construction of government buildings, dams, bridges, the rail network. Doodh mein bilkul paani nahin tha.
It is always interesting to read P. MISHRA. The title attracted me. but we come out of this article. Of course we agree with the observations developed by Mishra. But we waited for a deeper reflection on the Enlightenment philosophy in this part of Asia. Mishra’s remarks are limited to freedom of the press. This refexion is important, but it is fragmentary. Indeed, we have the impression that with the attractiveness of the Chinese model of development as well as the rise of illiberalism that we are witnessing the emergence of an alternative solution to the democracies born of the philosophy of enlightenment . The title of the article suggested a reflection, MISHRA on this phenomenon. But this is not the case