Whether DU will have its own entrance exams or adopt central govt's entrance test is yet to be decided. Panel also approved maternity leave for ad-hoc staff.
States where boards are less lenient with grading miss out due to the high cut-offs, says Yogesh Singh; Executive Council to take final call on DU’s proposal.
Fauja Singh, 114, died after being hit by a speeding car. His death renews questions about India’s deadly roads, rising accidents, and poor traffic discipline.
Mini deal will likely see no cut in 10% baseline tariff on Indian exports announced by Trump on 2 April, it is learnt, but additional 26% tariffs are set to be reduced.
India-Russia JV is also racing to deliver 7,000 more AK-203 assault rifles by 15 Aug. These are currently being made with 50% indigenisation and this will surge to 100% by 31 December.
Public, loud, upfront, filled with impropriety and high praise sometimes laced with insults. This is what we call Trumplomacy. But the larger objective is the same: American supremacy.
It does not show the NTA’s incompetence. It only shows the Union govt’s intent to ensure that maximum candidates qualify from the cow-belt states. In a fair exam, most seats will be occupied by students from southern Indian states and Bengal, Asam, Maharashtra, etc.
In fact, that is the reason why the Centre inteveened and created the NEET. To tilt the playing field in favour of students from the Hindi-belt.
The cut-offs for NEET-PG have been reduced – again for the very same reason.
The Leftist loonies seem to have taken iver control at The Print editorial board.
Why is the DU VC’s act concerning and deplorable? Higher education (and the position of VC) has always been highly politicised. Did the erstwhile VCs appointed during the Congress era not openly support the Congress? Where was decorum and decency back then?
As far as social media and Trump is concerned, one has to point out the lies being spread. Why is it that the Right-wing political forces are the only ones to be “fact-checked” by these platforms? Why are the same “fact-checking” standards not applied to the Left-liberals? Every single Trump nominee till date has been subjected to vile and vicious attacks by the Left-liberal cabal – most of it through lies and fake news. Misinformation and disinformation have been employed as potent weapons by the Left-liberal media organisations in their pursuit of Trump vilification. Why are social media platforms not expected to “fact-check” them?
You praise and approve of someone only as long as he acts in your favour and is biased towards you. The moment he attempts a course correction and tries to be even-handed, you accuse him of capitulation and indulging in post-fact rhetoric.
It does not show the NTA’s incompetence. It only shows the Union govt’s intent to ensure that maximum candidates qualify from the cow-belt states. In a fair exam, most seats will be occupied by students from southern Indian states and Bengal, Asam, Maharashtra, etc.
In fact, that is the reason why the Centre inteveened and created the NEET. To tilt the playing field in favour of students from the Hindi-belt.
The cut-offs for NEET-PG have been reduced – again for the very same reason.
The Leftist loonies seem to have taken iver control at The Print editorial board.
Why is the DU VC’s act concerning and deplorable? Higher education (and the position of VC) has always been highly politicised. Did the erstwhile VCs appointed during the Congress era not openly support the Congress? Where was decorum and decency back then?
As far as social media and Trump is concerned, one has to point out the lies being spread. Why is it that the Right-wing political forces are the only ones to be “fact-checked” by these platforms? Why are the same “fact-checking” standards not applied to the Left-liberals? Every single Trump nominee till date has been subjected to vile and vicious attacks by the Left-liberal cabal – most of it through lies and fake news. Misinformation and disinformation have been employed as potent weapons by the Left-liberal media organisations in their pursuit of Trump vilification. Why are social media platforms not expected to “fact-check” them?
You praise and approve of someone only as long as he acts in your favour and is biased towards you. The moment he attempts a course correction and tries to be even-handed, you accuse him of capitulation and indulging in post-fact rhetoric.
Great going “un-hyphenated journalism”.