Official data shows 118 militants have been killed, and recruitment has dipped 48% so far this year. But a 2010 lull like this had ended with a new phase of militancy.
Like China, India remains a big domestic market, which will continue to attract investment, but the US tariffs will make India unattractive for future investments.
New bill aims to fix key issues with IBC 2016, including delays & patchy implementation, and protect creditors, with window for genuine promoters to retain control of their companies.
India’s 1st tri-service seminar, on the lines of Shangri-La Dialogue, kicks off in Mhow, with top military officers & defence attaches from several countries in attendance.
Putin sees this as a victory. Europeans have decided to deal with Trump on his terms for the sake of the larger Western alliance. We look at the lessons for us in India.
Insurgency is dirtier and more difficult than war. Not only officers and soldiers have bigger responsibility to follow norms so that no finger is raised on their operations.
The senior hierarchy has to ensure that numbers game is not used to judge performance. It is this malaise of numbers that leads to fake encounters.
Training in ethics and morals has to be a continuous affair so that no
Price is greater than ethical values.
Insurgency is a ‘dirty’ war. Every army is trained and equipped to fight the enemy and survive.
When the enemy, an army fights has no ethic or morals is it fair to expect the army to follow the conventional ethic or morals ?
How does an army deal with insurgents known to using human shields.
Is there even time to establish whether the human shields are motivated willing or just innocents ?
Yes, if an involvement Army in local rivalries and revenge killings is established, it has to be dealt with in accordance with the law.
But reactions based on higher or lower threat perception of an individual has to be accepted as a legitimate action.
No force in world can be trained to fight a war with insurgents with one sided morals.
Insurgency is dirtier and more difficult than war. Not only officers and soldiers have bigger responsibility to follow norms so that no finger is raised on their operations.
The senior hierarchy has to ensure that numbers game is not used to judge performance. It is this malaise of numbers that leads to fake encounters.
Training in ethics and morals has to be a continuous affair so that no
Price is greater than ethical values.
Insurgency is a ‘dirty’ war. Every army is trained and equipped to fight the enemy and survive.
When the enemy, an army fights has no ethic or morals is it fair to expect the army to follow the conventional ethic or morals ?
How does an army deal with insurgents known to using human shields.
Is there even time to establish whether the human shields are motivated willing or just innocents ?
Yes, if an involvement Army in local rivalries and revenge killings is established, it has to be dealt with in accordance with the law.
But reactions based on higher or lower threat perception of an individual has to be accepted as a legitimate action.
No force in world can be trained to fight a war with insurgents with one sided morals.