Ex-MP complains to defence ministry and PMO about ‘corruption at the highest level’, alleges official used her influence to get the contract for husband.
Many 'independent' reports, intended to shape policies, are sponsored by industry groups or entities with deep pockets and vested interests. This process must become transparent.
While the move could free up grid capacity struggling to keep up with rapid renewable rollout, it would be a major setback for green ambitions. India aims to double clean power capacity to 500 gigawatts by the end of the decade.
Agreement signed during 17th Joint Working Group (JWG) on defence cooperation. Defence Secretary Rajesh Kumar Singh met Director General in Israeli Ministry of Defence Amir Baram Tuesday.
This world is being restructured and redrawn by one man, and what’s his power? It’s not his formidable military. It’s trade. With China, it turned on him.
It’s painful to read, a deptmental head denies to safeguard her husband, giving a false affidavit is punishable under law, case should be taken to its logical end and errant officials however highly placed must be tried as per rules and punished if guilt proved
1) Thecontract was offered only to exserice pedicel I. eArmy isinvolvedas pre condition
2) false affidavits are criminal offence. Te veteran acknowledged he knew WA he was doing
3) Any proof that CG mDA spoke to DGR?
4) The ex already had a livelyhood. He denied one to some ex A who needed it.
5) the ex Maj Gen. would be getting a fat pension also in addition to is wife’s salary for ‘roti,kapada aur makan’
A retired Major general is getting hefty pension . In addition he is employed in a top post carrying lakhs as salary again he is employed in private getting a good amount as salary. Then it seems that he is so greedy in amazing wealth. He may be above sixty and all of a sudden with heart failure he dies, can he able to take all this to heaven or hell where he is going. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE SUCH GREEDY. HE SHOULD HAVE ETHICS BEING A RETIRED GENERAL OF THE ARMY. IN FACT A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED FOR HIS WEALTH TO VERIFY WHETHER HE HAS EARNED CORRUPTED MONEY DURING HIS TENURE WITH THE ARMY.
“The contract was reserved for ex-servicemen, with the condition being that the winning bidder should not be employed with any private sector firm, or hold a government job”
There lies the rub. Why was the contract reserved for anyone? Said that, its almost impossible to prove corruption here. All 3 conditions were met by the husband. The real question should be — why make such stupid rules that are prone to corrupt processes?
It’s painful to read, a deptmental head denies to safeguard her husband, giving a false affidavit is punishable under law, case should be taken to its logical end and errant officials however highly placed must be tried as per rules and punished if guilt proved
1) Thecontract was offered only to exserice pedicel I. eArmy isinvolvedas pre condition
2) false affidavits are criminal offence. Te veteran acknowledged he knew WA he was doing
3) Any proof that CG mDA spoke to DGR?
4) The ex already had a livelyhood. He denied one to some ex A who needed it.
5) the ex Maj Gen. would be getting a fat pension also in addition to is wife’s salary for ‘roti,kapada aur makan’
A retired Major general is getting hefty pension . In addition he is employed in a top post carrying lakhs as salary again he is employed in private getting a good amount as salary. Then it seems that he is so greedy in amazing wealth. He may be above sixty and all of a sudden with heart failure he dies, can he able to take all this to heaven or hell where he is going. PEOPLE SHOULD NOT BE SUCH GREEDY. HE SHOULD HAVE ETHICS BEING A RETIRED GENERAL OF THE ARMY. IN FACT A THOROUGH INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED FOR HIS WEALTH TO VERIFY WHETHER HE HAS EARNED CORRUPTED MONEY DURING HIS TENURE WITH THE ARMY.
“The contract was reserved for ex-servicemen, with the condition being that the winning bidder should not be employed with any private sector firm, or hold a government job”
There lies the rub. Why was the contract reserved for anyone? Said that, its almost impossible to prove corruption here. All 3 conditions were met by the husband. The real question should be — why make such stupid rules that are prone to corrupt processes?