Johnson will address his Conservative Party’s annual conference in Manchester Wednesday and his office said he would present a “fair and reasonable compromise” offer to the EU.
As UK PM Johnson pushes for a Brexit election, how he fares in it may be determined by the public reaction to allegations that call his integrity into question.
In theory, the Supreme Court’s ruling doesn’t prevent Boris Johnson from trying to prorogue UK parliament again, unless he provides a clear justification.
Court stated the decision to suspend Parliament was now “null and of no effect” and it was now up to Speakers of the Commons and Lords to decide what to do next.
Two questions are pertinent: Why does the Trump administration keep making the same mistakes on the peace proposal? And what does a hurried peace plan mean on the ground?
While global corporations setting up GCCs in India continue to express confidence in availability of skilled AI engineers, the panel argued that India’s real challenge lies elsewhere.
Without a Congress revival, there can be no challenge to the BJP pan-nationally. Modi’s party is growing, and almost entirely at the cost of the Congress.
My God! Can one amend history? History is that which has happened. How do you change something that has already happened? If there are different accounts written by historians who were more or less contemporary to the incidents that are recorded, then you can choose one of the two or three such versions, that’s fine. Important phrase is, “more or less contemporary”, because the incident is likely to have been fresh in the memory of the scribe or historian. That’s understandable. But you cannot CREATE a version two hundred or three hundred years later!
Amit Shah and the rest of the RSS clan must remember that Karl Marx was not even born in the period whose historical accounts they find objectionable. There were no leftist or rightist historians in that period, when that bit of history was happening. They were just responsible people who wrote what they saw.
My God! Can one amend history? History is that which has happened. How do you change something that has already happened? If there are different accounts written by historians who were more or less contemporary to the incidents that are recorded, then you can choose one of the two or three such versions, that’s fine. Important phrase is, “more or less contemporary”, because the incident is likely to have been fresh in the memory of the scribe or historian. That’s understandable. But you cannot CREATE a version two hundred or three hundred years later!
Amit Shah and the rest of the RSS clan must remember that Karl Marx was not even born in the period whose historical accounts they find objectionable. There were no leftist or rightist historians in that period, when that bit of history was happening. They were just responsible people who wrote what they saw.