Former Union minister P. Chidambaram, who has been summoned by Bombay High Court in the case, has sought documents of the suits filed by 63 Moons Technologies.
The CBI is investigating Indira Jaising and husband Anand Grover over alleged FCRA violations in receiving foreign funds for their NGO, Lawyers Collective.
The Bombay High Court pulled up the film certification board while hearing a plea filed by Children's Film Society over a U certificate to its film "Chidiakhana".
Bilkis Bano, who was gang raped during the 2002 riots, earlier refused to accept a Rs 5 lakh offer and sought exemplary compensation from Gujarat govt.
The Bombay high court ruled that pregnancies past the 20-week mark could be terminated without court permission if it risked the mental or physical health of the mother/foetus.
MoSPI proposes to remove closed factories from IIP sample, aiming for truer picture of India’s industrial health in upcoming 2022–23 base series. Plan open to public feedback until 25 November.
Bihar is blessed with a land more fertile for revolutions than any in India. Why has it fallen so far behind then? Constant obsession with politics is at the root of its destruction.
Hair splitting apart, intolerance levels in India are rising faster than the flood waters in many parts of the country. Freedom of thought and speech is under severe threat.
Not one of these distinguished columnists has bothered to learn what was said in the courtroom. The judge started out by saying that none of these books are banned. He asked a question about the book in order to understand the intent of the defendant. We don’t know how the defendant responded but he could have said that it is not about war in another country or that it is about a collection of essays about Maoists. Can somebody please post the complete transcripts so we we can decide for ourselves? We don’t need opinions by people who didn’t bother to research the issue but are ready to issue opinions.
Not really but it does show up the media’s incompetence and proclivity to bark up the wrong tree. Time media gets its act together and a grip on facts. This time it even confused a book.
If people are seeking alternate political ideologies, then it means the current form of political system, democracy or baboocracy is impotent to meet their basic needs of life. If basic needs are met, where is the need to turn to violence for remedy? Civilian baboos and netas have consistently failed those people for seventy years. What happened to the promise of a democratic India? The rulers have changed, the system of oppression still remains the same. Why are the people still poor? How come baboos and netas have become disgustingly rich beyond imagination? Is the state of India truly serving the lowly Indian citizen? Everyone knows it’s a sham. We just don’t want to face the inconvenient truth. Indians never attained freedom.
A complete aversion to intellect. What if Mao’s Little Red Book was part of the collection. For a nuclear armed power, we seem extraordinarily diffident about our ability to keep ourselves safe. The higher judiciary is turning a little ambivalent towards being a fierce protector of the freedoms of the individual versus an all powerful state.
Hair splitting apart, intolerance levels in India are rising faster than the flood waters in many parts of the country. Freedom of thought and speech is under severe threat.
Not one of these distinguished columnists has bothered to learn what was said in the courtroom. The judge started out by saying that none of these books are banned. He asked a question about the book in order to understand the intent of the defendant. We don’t know how the defendant responded but he could have said that it is not about war in another country or that it is about a collection of essays about Maoists. Can somebody please post the complete transcripts so we we can decide for ourselves? We don’t need opinions by people who didn’t bother to research the issue but are ready to issue opinions.
Not really but it does show up the media’s incompetence and proclivity to bark up the wrong tree. Time media gets its act together and a grip on facts. This time it even confused a book.
If people are seeking alternate political ideologies, then it means the current form of political system, democracy or baboocracy is impotent to meet their basic needs of life. If basic needs are met, where is the need to turn to violence for remedy? Civilian baboos and netas have consistently failed those people for seventy years. What happened to the promise of a democratic India? The rulers have changed, the system of oppression still remains the same. Why are the people still poor? How come baboos and netas have become disgustingly rich beyond imagination? Is the state of India truly serving the lowly Indian citizen? Everyone knows it’s a sham. We just don’t want to face the inconvenient truth. Indians never attained freedom.
A complete aversion to intellect. What if Mao’s Little Red Book was part of the collection. For a nuclear armed power, we seem extraordinarily diffident about our ability to keep ourselves safe. The higher judiciary is turning a little ambivalent towards being a fierce protector of the freedoms of the individual versus an all powerful state.