Each of the three parties – Sunni Wakf Board, Nirmohi Akhara and Ram Lalla Virajman – has identified its own comfort zone in the grand claim for Ayodhya.
From wondering if there was ever any legal question asked over birth of Christ to looking for Lord Ram's descendants, SC has dealt with many odd questions.
The counsel for Ram Lalla Virajman argued that if Hindus and Muslims had jointly possessed the disputed Ayodhya site, how was it possible to oust Muslims.
Nirmohi Akhara, one of the claimants to the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid site, said just offering prayers couldn’t be taken as joint Hindu-Muslim possession.
On the first episode of Two Much With Kajol and Twinkle, Aamir Khan and Salman Khan were confronted with another hypocrisy: age gaps. And they didn't come out looking good.
SEBI probe concluded that purported loans and fund transfers were paid back in full and did not amount to deceptive market practices or unreported related party transactions.
While the IAF remains committed to the Tejas programme and has placed orders for 180 Tejas Mk1A, the force is eagerly waiting for the Tejas Mk 2 version.
What Munir has achieved with Trump is a return to normal, ironing out the post-Abbottabad crease. The White House picture gives us insight into how Pakistan survives, occasionally thrives and thinks.
The Sunni board is fighting a battle for the inconsequential abandoned mosque, which controversy has done irreparable damage to the interest of 18Cr Muslims of India who are today victims of polarisation, hate politics and biases tarding their every effort for a peaceful life.It is this controversy that changed the political demography of our secular nation. Whether they win or loose this battle, the generations of Muslims will loose the goodwill of Hindu brothers that is so vital for their progress.No minority can sustain without the goodwill of majority which the Sunni board is determined to erase in its intoxication as saviours of Muslims. The greatest service they could do is to pull out and say that the Muslims gift the land,and let it be a contest between the two Hindu parties. If the personal law board thinks it is protecting future claims of other mosques, again they are fooling themselves and the ignorant lot of Muslims as that will take another half a century. By then the community will be ruined.The need of the the day for Muslims is education , economic well being and good will of majority.The first step to reverse the damage done so far by Babri controversy is to immediately pull out of the case and announce magnanimously that Muslims gift it .If you fail the Muslims of India and coming generations would pay a price that you would be responsible.
The fact remains that the property is owned by the Muslims. If you go back in history to retake property where will it end? No ones property will be safe. All of this because of a fairy tale about someone that does not or did not exist! Insanity!
Cultural context of India must always remain Hindu, as 80% of population is Hindu and a few % hinduism derived religions. Other religions are free to exist minus conversions. There are many countries with official religions , Sri Lanka-Buddhist , China -Communist, Pak/Bangladesh -Islam , Burma – Buddhist , Mexico -Catholic , Almost all south American countries are official catholic , All middle east countries are official Islamic , Where is a Official Hindu Country on this planet ? Declare India an Official Hindu country and the pesky issues with cultural context will be over.
The title of this article suggests “intellectual-ish convolutions” which is the hiding place for a certain kind of authors. Babri case is a plain example of Hindus’ superiority complex and the consequent high-handedness which should not be allowed to go unchallenged by the law of the land. There is ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF that lord Ram was born in the exact premises where Babri mosque once stood. Period.
I agree totally. Sentiment and belief have no place in law. The law should be followed and this is a property dispute.
there is enough proof of the temple to predate controversial structure as per archaeological evidence. Rest all your point are whataboutery, that place had a temple and main temple of that city dedicated to diety. There is surely a reason for that. People palways perceived as the place of janmbhoomi.
And secondly use your real arabic name
Sorry to disappoint you, I am an Indian Hindu who belives in constitutional democracy and the rule of law, not mobocracy. In law there is no scope for sentiment.
The Sunni board is fighting a battle for the inconsequential abandoned mosque, which controversy has done irreparable damage to the interest of 18Cr Muslims of India who are today victims of polarisation, hate politics and biases tarding their every effort for a peaceful life.It is this controversy that changed the political demography of our secular nation. Whether they win or loose this battle, the generations of Muslims will loose the goodwill of Hindu brothers that is so vital for their progress.No minority can sustain without the goodwill of majority which the Sunni board is determined to erase in its intoxication as saviours of Muslims. The greatest service they could do is to pull out and say that the Muslims gift the land,and let it be a contest between the two Hindu parties. If the personal law board thinks it is protecting future claims of other mosques, again they are fooling themselves and the ignorant lot of Muslims as that will take another half a century. By then the community will be ruined.The need of the the day for Muslims is education , economic well being and good will of majority.The first step to reverse the damage done so far by Babri controversy is to immediately pull out of the case and announce magnanimously that Muslims gift it .If you fail the Muslims of India and coming generations would pay a price that you would be responsible.
The fact remains that the property is owned by the Muslims. If you go back in history to retake property where will it end? No ones property will be safe. All of this because of a fairy tale about someone that does not or did not exist! Insanity!
Cultural context of India must always remain Hindu, as 80% of population is Hindu and a few % hinduism derived religions. Other religions are free to exist minus conversions. There are many countries with official religions , Sri Lanka-Buddhist , China -Communist, Pak/Bangladesh -Islam , Burma – Buddhist , Mexico -Catholic , Almost all south American countries are official catholic , All middle east countries are official Islamic , Where is a Official Hindu Country on this planet ? Declare India an Official Hindu country and the pesky issues with cultural context will be over.
(Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_religion )
Very true ! ; this should be done.
The title of this article suggests “intellectual-ish convolutions” which is the hiding place for a certain kind of authors. Babri case is a plain example of Hindus’ superiority complex and the consequent high-handedness which should not be allowed to go unchallenged by the law of the land. There is ABSOLUTELY NO PROOF that lord Ram was born in the exact premises where Babri mosque once stood. Period.
I agree totally. Sentiment and belief have no place in law. The law should be followed and this is a property dispute.
there is enough proof of the temple to predate controversial structure as per archaeological evidence. Rest all your point are whataboutery, that place had a temple and main temple of that city dedicated to diety. There is surely a reason for that. People palways perceived as the place of janmbhoomi.
And secondly use your real arabic name
Sorry to disappoint you, I am an Indian Hindu who belives in constitutional democracy and the rule of law, not mobocracy. In law there is no scope for sentiment.