In its report on the Ministry of Culture's budget for 2026-27, the Standing Committee on Transport, Tourism and Culture noted that no staff are physically present at ASI-designated protected monuments.
Chandra Kumar Bose said on 12 March that the cap was missing from the museum. ASI denied it, saying the artefact had been taken to Port Blair for an exhibition.
Material and photos of artefacts discovered as part of a programme under Pleach India Foundation were on display at the History Literature Festival in Hyderabad.
The core conservation and preservation work of around 3,685 centrally protected monuments in India has been under the ASI's mandate, and it will remain so.
Shiv Kumar Mishra, co-convener of INTACH's Bihar chapter, said the Bihar govt should first maintain sites under its control before questioning the ASI.
In the storm around Sinauli, many academics dismissed claims of chariots being found. And the public misinterpreted the chariots as a device planted by the govt to fortify Hindutva.
An incorrect colonial portrayal cast a shadow for 200 years on Banaras royal family. Pradeep Narayan Singh waded through archives for 5 years to clear his ancestor Jagat Singh’s name in Sarnath.
The National Policy on Archaeological Excavation and Explorations, which was approved in 2015, mentioned the need for problem-oriented, long-term research projects covering various time periods.
In FY 2025-26, AoN for 55 proposals amounting to Rs 6.73 lakh cr has been accorded by DAC. Both the quantum of AoN given and capital contracts signed, so far, have been the highest in any FY.
Why are you calling old Tamil scripts as Tamil brahmi call as Tamizhi. Tamil is self developed language before BC and not depend on any other language.
Any doubts in the report has to be dealt with, as per proper process and professional integrity and do re excavation and validate the period classification.
But ASI is against reexcavations and just want’s to edit the report and close it. How’s that archaeological and scientific? Is it scientific to just demand that the data be modified to match their religious propoganda? Still it’s name is ASI. Joke.
ThePrint’s framing is deliberately misleading — ASI demanding “additions and corrections” is not some neutral housekeeping. Only the actual excavation team can determine findings; you can’t just “change numbers” from an office in Delhi. Amarnath Ramakrishna never “refused” corrections — he made it clear that if numbers are to be re-validated, it can only be through fresh excavations, not desk edits that undermine the science.
Why are you calling old Tamil scripts as Tamil brahmi call as Tamizhi. Tamil is self developed language before BC and not depend on any other language.
Any doubts in the report has to be dealt with, as per proper process and professional integrity and do re excavation and validate the period classification.
But ASI is against reexcavations and just want’s to edit the report and close it. How’s that archaeological and scientific? Is it scientific to just demand that the data be modified to match their religious propoganda? Still it’s name is ASI. Joke.
ThePrint’s framing is deliberately misleading — ASI demanding “additions and corrections” is not some neutral housekeeping. Only the actual excavation team can determine findings; you can’t just “change numbers” from an office in Delhi. Amarnath Ramakrishna never “refused” corrections — he made it clear that if numbers are to be re-validated, it can only be through fresh excavations, not desk edits that undermine the science.