In a city without elected corporators since 2022, all competing parties have attempted to solidify their core bases through their manifestos, with infra promises & unmistakable signals.
Delhi’s lift policy was meant to make life easier for the elderly, but it’s pitted neighbours against each other. Some need lifts for mobility, others fear losing light and privacy.
According to the Interim Budget, extra 2 crore houses under Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojna-Gramin will be made in 5 yrs. Plan to launch a special housing scheme was announced by Modi last yr
Maharashtra & Andhra Pradesh also fare well in delivery of affordable homes to urban poor. Among UTs, Delhi tops with 27,308 houses while Andaman & Nicobar is at bottom with 45.
In 2022, athletes claimed they were asked to wind up training early at Thyagraj Stadium so that the IAS couple could walk their dog. Then came the memes and public outrage.
Instead of buying more Mirages outright in early 2000s, the requirement was tweaked in favour of a medium-weight, multi-role fighter with Mirage-like performance.
Pakistan not only has zero chance of catching up with India in most areas, but will inevitably see the gap rising. Its leaders will offer its people the same snake oil in different bottles.
A balanced piece. The point is lift should be built in blind sight and as far as accommodate those who live on ground floor. Light and ventilation is a real issue and not a flimsy one.
It should not be that might is right. The policy itself is flawed. The ground floor owner paid extra money for the apartment and why should he suffer.
I cannot believe a news site has done this… A media company is supposed to be unbiased but showing such a one sided story does not seem very unbiased media like. Where are the interviews from anyone suffering and in actual need of access. Where are the interviews from people on the third floor ..?
A balanced piece. The point is lift should be built in blind sight and as far as accommodate those who live on ground floor. Light and ventilation is a real issue and not a flimsy one.
It should not be that might is right. The policy itself is flawed. The ground floor owner paid extra money for the apartment and why should he suffer.
I cannot believe a news site has done this… A media company is supposed to be unbiased but showing such a one sided story does not seem very unbiased media like. Where are the interviews from anyone suffering and in actual need of access. Where are the interviews from people on the third floor ..?