Before NRC, these two Assam tribunals dealt with the illegal immigrants issue
Politics

Before NRC, these two Assam tribunals dealt with the illegal immigrants issue

The Foreigners Tribunal and the Illegal Migrants Determination Tribunal have historically determined the issue, but were marred by high pendency.

   
Latest news on NRC | ThePrint,.in

People queue up to check their names on the final draft of the NRC in Assam | PTI

The Foreigners Tribunal and the Illegal Migrants Determination Tribunal have historically determined the issue, but were marred by high pendency.

New Delhi: As many as four million applicants, out of 32.9 million have not made it to the final draft of the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam made public on 30 July. While it’s not yet clear who will decide their fate, the issue of illegal immigrants in Assam has been historically determined by two tribunals.

The first is the Foreigners Tribunal (FT), set up by the Assam government in 1964, to identify the legal status of suspected foreigners in Assam. There are 100 FTs in Assam as on date.

The second is the Illegal Migrants Determination Tribunal, or IM (DT), established in 1985, with special provisions for Assam. It only considered the cases of those who had allegedly entered India after 25 March, 1971; crucially, these placed the onus of proving citizenship on the accuser, rather than the accused. The IM (DT) Act was struck down by the Supreme Court as being unconstitutional in 2005.


Also read: No, thank you, Bengalis in Assam tell Mamata as she raises pitch against NRC


High pendency has plagued the working of the two tribunals, according to data from a 2012 white paper issued by the Assam government. Between 1985 and 2012, about 221,000 cases were referred to the two tribunals. During this period, they disposed of only about 97,000 cases.

In these, they declared about 55,000 individuals as foreigners, leading to the deportation of 2,442 individuals (Chart 1). Between the two tribunals, the IM (DT) courts have been seen to be far less efficient and also less likely in declaring a person a foreigner. However, they were more likely to effect deportations (Chart 2).

The high pendency in the two tribunals has been attributed to the lack of judicial supervision, long vacancies of members and inadequate staff. And now, in Assam, there are four million cases to be heard.


Also read: Guwahati advocate asks CJI Misra why Justice Gogoi, an Assamese, is hearing NRC case


Arjun Srinivas is a recipient of the Mint-Hindustan Times-How India Lives Data Fellowship 2018.

By special arrangement with