Women are more likely to feed free-ranging cats, or stray cats, than men, finds study | Representative image | pxfuel
Representative image of cats | pxfuel
Text Size:

Back in mid-April, I took my 13-year-old cat to the vet for some tests. They told me his chronic heart disease had worsened, but it was nothing alarming. His condition started to deteriorate a few days later, ultimately leading to a 3 a.m. trip to the emergency room on April 27. The emergency veterinarians told me his blood readings were baffling; X-rays showed blood clots in his lungs. He died later that day.

At first it just seemed like one more sad thing to cope with during this time of Covid-19 — then, last week, I got a call from virologist David Sanders of Purdue University. He wanted to tell me about a new paper showing Covid-19 infections in cats. He said it looked like high-quality work, and it could have important implications for the spread of the virus. I started to wonder whether my own cat had picked up Covid-19 while waiting with other cats for his checkup at the vet’s.

The anecdotes about Covid-19 infecting cats at first seemed like a sideshow. But now, scientists have determined that the virus spreads readily among cats. That means scientists will need to start doing epidemiological studies on other species to understand and control this virus.


Also read: This migrant family is returning to Bundelkhand with a special friend — ‘Mr Tommy’


University of Wisconsin biologist Peter Halfmann, a co-author on the cat paper, says his research was inspired by anecdotes they’d heard — the most striking one being that a caretaker apparently infected multiple tigers at the Bronx Zoo. They were worried about cats in shelters, veterinary clinics and humane societies.

They set out to investigate with an experiment, the results of which have recently been published in the New England Journal of Medicine. They infected three cats with Covid-19 and paired each with a virus-free cat. These partner cats tested positive on day three, day five and day six. None of the cats developed any symptoms of the illness, he says. But the disease could be dangerous to a cat that is older and had comorbidities, like his own cat. And, I thought, like mine.

This raises questions about animal-to-animal transmission, and human-animal transmission since, of course, humans are animals, too.

We are deeply grateful to our readers & viewers for their time, trust and subscriptions.

Quality journalism is expensive and needs readers to pay for it. Your support will define our work and ThePrint’s future.

SUBSCRIBE NOW

Tony Goldberg, a professor of epidemiology and veterinary medicine at the University of Wisconsin, said that it’s not uncommon for diseases to bounce around between species. Ferrets are often victims of human flu viruses, for example. When people bring sick ferrets to the vet, they often appear to have the same cough and runny nose as their pets.

Sometimes a virus can be deadlier to another species than it is to us — just as SARS-CoV-2 is likely deadlier to us than to the animal it came from. For example, Goldberg recently published a preprint paper warning that great apes have the same cell receptor we do that allows the virus into our cells. In a news article in Science, he warns of the serious danger Covid-19 might pose to endangered great apes.

Other coronaviruses have spread to chimpanzees and killed them, even though they only gave humans a mild cold. Camels became an integral part of the MERS crisis, and civet cats tested positive for SARS in China.

The civet cats story shows another risk for animals: that humans will blame and victimize them. That’s happened before, as noted in David Quammen’s book “Spillover: Animal Infections and the Next Human Pandemic.” In the chapter on the 2003 SARS epidemic, he describes how the Chinese health authorities originally thought, probably wrongly, that people had gotten the disease from a civet cat.

“More than a thousand captive civets were suffocated, burned, boiled, electrocuted and drowned,” writes Quammen. “It was like a Medieval pogrom against satanic cats.”

Further work showed it was a different animal altogether — a tiny brown bat — that harbored the original SARS virus.

Similarly, early on Covid-19 was associated with an armadillo-like animal called a pangolin, but Goldberg says pangolins did not give us this disease. The association comes from the fact that pangolins carry a different coronavirus that has one part that’s nearly identical to SARS-CoV-2. Goldberg says pangolins are gentle creatures who need more positive press. “We shouldn’t start persecuting pangolins,” he says. Bats are now the prime suspect as the source of Covid-19.

Figuring out the role any animal plays in a human virus is difficult. The exact role of civets in SARS is still unclear; some people think they may have played some part in the spread of the disease even if they weren’t the primary hosts.

While there’s clearly a lot of uncertainty here, Halfmann said I wasn’t crazy to worry that my cat died from Covid-19, and that it would be possible to pick it up at a veterinary clinic. Neither the cat nor I had been anywhere else for days.

He says it might be smart to keep cats indoors, and for veterinarians to take precautions to protect their patients from spreading the virus to each other. And he says that the cats may more easily transmit the virus to other cats than to humans. Any threat they or other animals pose to us is likely very small compared to the threat we could pose to them. – Bloomberg


Also read: Walk, play, train — how dog parents are keeping pets happy, engaged and safe in lockdown


 

Subscribe to our channels on YouTube & Telegram

News media is in a crisis & only you can fix it

You are reading this because you value good, intelligent and objective journalism. We thank you for your time and your trust.

You also know that the news media is facing an unprecedented crisis. It is likely that you are also hearing of the brutal layoffs and pay-cuts hitting the industry. There are many reasons why the media’s economics is broken. But a big one is that good people are not yet paying enough for good journalism.

We have a newsroom filled with talented young reporters. We also have the country’s most robust editing and fact-checking team, finest news photographers and video professionals. We are building India’s most ambitious and energetic news platform. And we aren’t even three yet.

At ThePrint, we invest in quality journalists. We pay them fairly and on time even in this difficult period. As you may have noticed, we do not flinch from spending whatever it takes to make sure our reporters reach where the story is. Our stellar coronavirus coverage is a good example. You can check some of it here.

This comes with a sizable cost. For us to continue bringing quality journalism, we need readers like you to pay for it. Because the advertising market is broken too.

If you think we deserve your support, do join us in this endeavour to strengthen fair, free, courageous, and questioning journalism, please click on the link below. Your support will define our journalism, and ThePrint’s future. It will take just a few seconds of your time.

Support Our Journalism

1 Comment Share Your Views

1 COMMENT

  1. Don’t publish such articles for gods sake… though pet are less susceptible to COVID and rarely fatal to them as per research reports but our stupid public doesn’t have basic social behavior and start targeting poor pets in panic even if one such case is reported in India. We Indians do not even have value for human life what value they have for pets.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here