Even in the most innocent times nobody in Punjab would believe that the OTT release and then sudden withdrawal of Honey Trehan/Diljit Dosanjh’s Satluj was without political motives.
In this era of conspiracy theories, everybody in Punjab seems to have their own ‘insight’ into this. If the BJP wanted to stop the film, as CBFC’s 127 proposed cuts showed, it could’ve easily made sure Zee wouldn’t release it. It’s also owned by somebody close to it politically.
Then, why would he pull it in 48 hours? Everybody would’ve known that once out in digital form, it will be shown widely. If anything, the controversy will give it more fire and fury. The buzz in Punjab headed for elections early next year is: who benefits the most from this controversy? Or who will it hurt the most? As usually happens, one outcome leads to the other.
Let’s list four things the film does.
One, by focusing on just the man who investigated ‘fake’ encounters after the militancy was over, it’s playing into a generation-old grievance. The film will rekindle fresh anger with its revisionism.
Two, in a hardly subtle way, there is heroism bestowed upon the militants. Watch the way the 31 August, 1995 human bomb assassination of Chief Minister Beant Singh is portrayed. In the background plays the foremost Sikh verse of martyrdom in battle.
Three, while it’s bound to anger many younger Sikhs with no lived experience of the decade of terror, those particularly affected will be the Jats (‘Jutt’ in Punjab), especially among the more religious and conservative sections. A critical mass of them, in terms of a percentage of overall demographics or voter base, live in Punjab’s border districts and traditional strongholds of the Shiromani Akali Dal.
And four, overtly the film is so apolitical as to be anodyne. It’s as if this was a private war between the militants and the police.
We only know the demographic it’s bound to trigger the most. They’re the relatively conservative sections of the Jutt Sikhs, especially in rural constituencies.
Also Read: Punjab is fast becoming the new Northeast. And there’s a message in it for Modi
Where might their vote go as a result? The Akali Dal, which has traditionally owned this vote, has been on the ropes already. In the 2024 Lok Sabha elections it lost the Tarn Taran/Khadoor Sahib constituency to jailed radical Amritpal Singh by a huge margin. The radicals got another seat, Faridkot, won by Sarabjeet Singh Khalsa, the son of Delhi cop Beant Singh who was one of Indira Gandhi’s two assassins.
This mass of voters was already angry, disaffected from their mainstream politicians, especially the Akalis. It’s unlikely that the same voter, further angered by Satluj, will return to Akali Dal. They’re even more likely to stay with the radicals. And because this conservative mass will almost definitely not go to the Congress or AAP, there’s only one party that benefits.
See it like this. Power in Punjab has rotated among three entrenched political forces: the Congress, Akali Dal and AAP. The radicals are the fourth, if limited.
Even to be a coalition partner the radicals will need the Akalis to win a third of the seats, an improbability. For the Akalis, with their ‘believers’ vote split, they can be driven to further marginalisation. AAP has to deal with anti-incumbency and attacks from the Sikh clergy. The Congress is fighting with itself. In this melee if the Hindu vote consolidates, only the BJP benefits.
See Punjab politics through its demographics. Contrary to folklore, Punjab isn’t a Sikh state. The Sikhs, at 58 percent, are a majority, but Hindus at around 40 percent are significant. If the Sikh vote fractionalises and the Hindus come together, the state could take an unimagined turn.
We can cut and dice this further. Of the Sikhs, about 60 percent are Jutts, say, about one-fourth of the state’s overall population. They form the bulk of the Akali, radical and anti-Congress vote. If more of it shifts to the radicals, it decimates Akali Dal and benefits AAP or the Congress. The BJP wants to consolidate the Hindus as in West Bengal and Assam.
If they get 70 percent of the Hindu vote, they’re in business in what will then become a five-way split.
A relatively under-appreciated factor is the Dalit vote in Punjab. It’s widely, and quite reliably estimated at 33 percent, Sikh and Hindu. They’re 35 percent of the Sikhs. Traditionally the Congress had a foothold there, and AAP cut into it. An important point is the sway that the many babas and deras have on this vote bank. That’s why rape convict Gurmeet Ram Rahim gets paroles on the eve of any polling, even a panchayat election. The BJP has built this constituency for long.
Next week, the Prime Minister visits Punjab. He will go to Jalandhar to inaugurate the new railway station, but the really politically significant move will be his expected visit to Dera Sachkhand Ballan, the ‘seat’ of Sant Niranjan Dass ji. He’s the spiritual leader of the Ravidassia Dalit community. We don’t know the split, but the larger community, of what will be described as Jatavs in the Hindi heartland, constitutes just about half of all Dalits in Punjab. In this Republic Day’s list of honours, Sant Niranjan featured with a Padma Shri. You can add two and two.
Next step, is electoral data. After the break of the old alliance with Akali Dal over farm bills, BJP decided to go alone in Punjab. It was arrogant and suicidal, it was widely thought.
Sure enough, in the 2022 assembly elections it got just 6.6 percent. But in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls it went up to 18.65 percent. It sounds even more impressive given that Congress and AAP were at around 26 percent each and the Akalis were reduced to 13.48 percent as conservative Sikh vote moved to the radicals. They’re looking down the barrel now. You can understand why they’re organising shows of Satluj in “every village” of the state.
The BJP is hoping if they can go up to 30 percent vote and max out in the 55 constituencies where Hindus have significant presence and have the deras deliver the Dalits, they can be the largest party. It looks like simple enough arithmetic, and to that extent it might see the risk of a fresh wave of radicalisation worth its while. For sure, it would believe it will be able to put it down quickly and so what if another Satluj-like film is made 30 years later. We need to note that while the Akalis are celebrating Satluj and others are quiet it’s only the BJP’s Ravneet Singh Bittu who’s attacking it. You might credit this on his being former chief minister Beant Singh’s grandson, but if you think any BJP leader goes out on a limb without the party’s approval, you must be naive.
Nobody can be sure, but this would look like the most logical explanation for this dramatic Satluj release and withdrawal on Zee5. It’s just that Punjab’s voters can also surprise us. The Satluj protagonist Jaswant Singh Khalra’s wife contested for Lok Sabha from Tarn Taran/Khadoor Sahib twice, in 1999 for a breakaway Akali Dal faction when she lost her deposit and then in 2019 to finish third, with the Congress winning the most “religious Sikh” seat in the state. In 2019, she was fielded by Punjab Ekta Party that Sukhpal Singh Khaira formed after breaking away from AAP. Khaira is now in the Congress and among its most vocal leaders. All of this just in case you thought only Bihar’s politics was complicated.
Also Read: What’s common between Netflix Chamkila and Trudeau’s trouble-infested Canada? They don’t get Punjab
Is BJP repeating the Congress (mis)take of encouraging a kind of Bhindrawale, if not a person than a sentiment? As Shekhar Gupta ominously indicates, “to that extent it might see the risk of a fresh wave of radicalisation worth its while.” Indeed!
Party interest above national interest — that is happening for decades in Indian politics.
Accordingly, let a few (dozen? hundred? thousand?) innocent die — but that ‘worth its while’. Another masterstroke of a divine leader!
The 1980s as a wasted decade for India. If that is an accurate assessment, what a tragedy. Two decisive mandates, Mrs Gandhi storming back to power in January 1980. Rajiv Gandhi’s four hundred plus debut, a nation’s tribute to his slain mother. That is the time China began its trek to greatness under Comrade Deng. Also, realistically, when was an essential parity between the two countries.
Grow a little philosophical with age. Join the dots. Why is calm not returning to Manipur. Or even Kashmir. Blunt force can keep the lid on the pressure cooker almost indefinitely. But it saps national energies, resources. In some ways, the 1980s a wasted decade for India.
Punjab needs a “ fresh wave of radicalisation “ like a hole in the head. Have read some old columns because this became topical and was dismayed by what Mrs Gandhi and Giani Zail Singh created, with sons Sanjay and Rajiv playing minor supporting roles. The trauma and tragedy of Operation Bluestar. A residue of bitterness in the Sikh diaspora. Punjab itself, once one of the richest states ( per capita income ) falling behind the rest of the country. Problems with its pattern of agriculture. The desperation of the young to emigrate, even to drive trucks abroad. As a Punjabi who has never set foot on the sacred soil of Punjab, can only pray for enlightened political leadership.
The Sikhs are just crybabies. They keep crying all the time for all kinds of real and imagined horrors. Point is which state did not have a horrific past?
How many were killed and butchered in Assam from 1960 to late 1990s? How many young men and boys were murdered in cold blood in West Bengal during the Naxalite uprising – stretching over two decades?
Suffering and sacrifice and bloodshed is not Punjab’s legacy alone. It’s a tragic fate suffered by so many others across India.
But you would not find an Assamese or a Bengali crying or cribbing about it today. They carry the hurt and the past stoically.
But Sikhs seem to be of a different kind altogether. What makes things worse is that people like Shekhar Gupta cash in on this ‘discontent’ and keep making videos and writing articles – just to rake in the moolah as they know it will touch a cord with the ‘discontented’ ones.